A survey question asks participants to convey their feelings about a new potato chip flavor on a scale ranging from "terrific" to "horrible." This type of attitude scale is classified as a Semantic Differential Scale. Explanation: Originally developed by Charles E. Osgood, the Semantic Differential (SD) is a rating scale often utilized to assess opinions through varying connotations such as adjectives. These semantic meanings are believed to reflect a person's attitude towards particular objects and are widely used in research to evaluate personal opinions, values, and preferences.
Answer:
b.
Explanation:
Kurt Lewin was born in 1890 and passed away in 1947. He was a prominent American psychologist originally from Germany. Kurt Lewin is recognized as 'the father of social psychology' and made significant contributions to the study of group dynamics. He was never elected as APA President. However, in 1917, Robert Mearns Yerkes held the position of APA president.
Answer:
The origin of experimental psychology can be traced back to a psychologist named Wilhelm Wundt, who collected objective metrics on individuals' reaction times as well as subjective data from their personal experiences.
The psychologist Edward Titchener adopted this latter method known as introspection to construct a psychological framework termed structuralism.
Explanation:
Regarded as a pioneer of contemporary psychology, Wilhelm Wundt was the first individual to label himself as a psychologist. He conducted experiments focusing on reaction times and the emotional experiences of individuals to validate his theories.
Edward Titchener was a long-term student of Wundt and his theories were significantly influenced by Wundt's work. Titchener perceived thoughts and sensations as components of consciousness, advocating that categorizing these elements could reveal the nature of mental processes and higher-order thought. He primarily employed introspection as his investigative method.
Bahadur Shah Zafar was not a talented son of a competent father.
Explanation:
While he exhibited greater bravery and skill as a ruler compared to several of his predecessors, Zafar was not an effective administrator. His true passions lay in poetry and the arts rather than in kingship, which was evident in how he governed.
His father was a less assertive leader who avoided challenging the British, which ultimately led to his downfall.
In contrast, Zafar was an idealistic monarch, finding himself too powerless to effectively maintain authority.
