answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mina
2 months ago
6

Reread the arguments on the previous slide about the positive and negative aspects of social media. In a well-constructed paragr

aph: evaluate which argument is more effective. identify the authors’ claims, reasons, and evidence. compare and contrast the perspectives of the authors. identify fallacies used by either side.
English
2 answers:
Leya [7.7K]2 months ago
8 0

Response:

Example Answer: The argument supporting social media usage is the more persuasive one. It is claimed in the article that students achieve better results academically when using social media. The author provides anecdotal instances of social media aiding students in class discussions, and further empirical research shows that grades improved when students utilized social media. The counterargument is weak as it does not provide specific proof. The author enumerates a range of negative aspects associated with social media through parallelism but fails to offer evidence for these negative claims. Furthermore, the author includes a bandwagon fallacy by implying that most people who succeed do not engage with social media.

Clarification:

Just finished the assignment. You can utilize any part of the response, and it will suffice.

hammer [7.6K]2 months ago
7 0

Response:

Example Response: The case for utilizing social media presents a more compelling argument. The article asserts that students improve academically with social media use. It offers anecdotal examples of students employing social media for coursework discussions and backs this with empirical data indicating grade improvements in a study with social media engagement. Conversely, the opposing argument against social media is less convincing due to the absence of concrete evidence. The writer relies on parallelism to enumerate various negative impacts of social media, yet fails to substantiate these claims. Additionally, the writer commits the bandwagon fallacy by suggesting that most successful individuals refrain from using social media.

Clarification:

I completed the assignment.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is true of focus groups? a. A focus group is often very difficult to set up and is the most expensive met
Naddik [7538]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

A focus group consists of a diverse set of individuals brought together to deliberate on specific subjects. This discourse represents a qualitative research approach where participants express their views, beliefs, and perspectives regarding the discussed topics.

Such interactions can sway opinions among group members while sharing insights and reflections. Furthermore, this method aids the researcher in gathering information from consumers.

Despite its advantages, this technique does not always yield successful outcomes.

Thus, the correct choice is option D.

4 0
2 months ago
Which elements keep you most interested in a fictional book? Check any that apply.
Naddik [7538]
The elements that captivate my attention in a non-fiction book vary based on its genre. For example, a mystery book would engage readers if it includes an unresolved enigma, whereas an adventure narrative might attract readers if it draws on actual historical events or factual occurrences related to the story. Thus, when it comes to fiction, I can find interest in various elements depending on the book type.
6 0
13 days ago
Read 2 more answers
Please help me!<br> Use the textual context to identify the meanings of the words in bold.
Gnom [7528]
The accurate responses in order are as follows: Equitable: In the context of the Frankenstein document, this term can be interpreted as synonymous with fair and impartial. A dictionary check supports this definition as well. Turkish: Ordinarily associated with something or someone from Turkey or the Turkish language, in this context, it describes a merchant's unpleasant demeanor; thus, the right interpretation is extremely unpleasant. Flagrant: In the given context highlighting a blatant injustice against an individual, stemming from their religion rather than their actions, the proper meaning here is glaringly obvious. Adverse: The context refers to an individual who cannot embrace or adjust to a particular location, as it contradicts her identity, leading to the correct interpretation of acting against or in a contrary direction.
4 0
26 days ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Thoreau’s general opinion of government relate to his imprisonment, as described in "Civil Disobedience"?
Naddika [7460]
Thoreau's perspective on government, as portrayed in "Civil Disobedience," connects to his time in jail because he felt that the government was corrupt, which justified his choice to refuse tax payments, even when it led to his imprisonment. In his essay, he argues that individuals should resist unjust laws enacted by the state. He recalls his protest against slavery and the Mexican War by withholding taxes. Thoreau distinguishes between two categories of laws: divine laws, which prioritize humanity and supersede human-made laws. If human laws are deemed unjust and counter to humanity, Thoreau believes that citizens have the moral right to dissent.
8 0
1 month ago
Read 2 more answers
Only when each of the committee members ____ reading the instructions then can you ____ them to the hall.
hammer [7621]

In this case, the verbs that align with the subject are "finish/take"

A verb in English is categorized as a term that indicates any action, event, or state of being. In essence, a verb signifies an action or a doing word.

Examples of verbs include dance, sing, walk, play, run, sit, clap, cheer, read, etc.

A subject refers to the individual, object, concept, or location that executes an action within a sentence.

Furthermore, subject-verb agreement pertains to the concordance between the subject and predicate in a sentence.

This means that a verb and its corresponding subject need to agree in terms of number or tense.

In this specific example, the verb finish (in present tense) is the most suitable since its subject (crowd) is singular (referring to each committee member). Likewise, the second part of the sentence should utilize the verb take (also in the present tense).

In summary, the verbs finish and take satisfy the subject-verb agreement in this scenario.

5 0
1 month ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Examine the brochure. What techniques does the brochure use to effectively communicate the message? Write three to four sentence
    6·2 answers
  • Write two paragraphs that analyze two points about why Gilgamesh is an epic hero. Be sure to use more than one example from the
    9·1 answer
  • The two main characters in "Tennessee's Partner" are depicted as _____. desperate thieves sympathetic pathetic losers cunning
    7·2 answers
  • What type of rhyme is used in this excerpt from William Butler Yeats's poem "The Municipal Gallery Revisited"? My mediaeval knee
    9·2 answers
  • Read the scenario about a formal discussion.
    10·2 answers
  • Match each excerpt to the figure of speech is uses.
    6·2 answers
  • Review the underlined paragraphs on pages 2-3 of both Passage 1 and Passage 2. Which sentence BEST explains how the views CONFLI
    11·1 answer
  • What motivates Cyclops to ask Poseidon to interfere with Odysseus’s journey home?
    13·2 answers
  • Choose the italicized controlling idea in the topic sentence below. A. In most American homes, family time is replaced with TV t
    10·1 answer
  • Write a sentence that mentions a clothes store and one of your family members.
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!