Confrontations push the plot forward, as they create an outcome where no one gains—a lose-lose scenario, resulting in a lack of resolution, and possibly exacerbating the situation.
The right choice is A. The author supplies data to illustrate the adverse effects of a poor diet.
Clarification:
In this part of the article, the writer emphasizes the detrimental impacts of unhealthy eating, indicating a strong belief in the necessity of a healthy diet and the negative outcomes of not adhering to it. Additionally, the author supports this notion with statistical evidence, evident in phrases like "Over a third of adults in the United States -- 37.5 percent -- are classified as obese" and "childhood obesity rates have tripled in the last three decades" as these quantitative details highlight the harmful outcomes tied to poor dietary choices. Thus, the author's argumentative method incorporates statistics to reveal the damaging effects of unhealthy eating habits.
Beowulf is an ancient English tale authored by an unknown writer. It narrates the exploits of the valiant Beowulf, who possesses great strength and succeeds in vanquishing the monster Grendel, Grendel's mother, and eventually a dragon. The Danes are pleased with his achievements and reward Beowulf with numerous gifts.
Subjective explanations stem from or are shaped by individual experiences, beliefs, and thoughts.
I merely copied and pasted this to check if others had provided an answer; one individual claimed B and that response received 5 stars along with several thanks, so I would go with B. Additionally, B appears to be more objective as it's influenced by the person's feelings about the character.
