Answer:
I may be late, but here are my suggestions:
Perplex: to confuse -> Baffle
Produced; to shape -> Wrought
Knead; to work -> Kneaded
<span>The experiment performed by Nicole Ruedy supports the author's main idea. She reviewed the information provided by the author and concluded that it was significant and relevant to her views. Additionally, she offered further insights for the author's research.</span>
Response: Certain individuals' acceptance may hinge on their profession.
Clarification: While tattoos have become increasingly accepted, the nature of the tattoos plays a crucial role. One might have extensive tattoos, but if they feature inappropriate imagery or are overly provocative, potential employers could request that they conceal them or may not hire them at all. For instance, applying for a position at Chick-fil-A with demonic-themed tattoos would likely result in an 90% chance of being turned away, as such markings conflict with the company’s values. Workplace policies vary widely; nonetheless, as long as the tattoos are non-offensive and can be hidden, they're generally tolerated.
Levitt and Dubner, the authors of the influential book "Freakonomics," argue that students have always felt compelled to cheat to achieve better grades, which in turn can lead to improved social status. Additionally, teachers started to engage in cheating as they, too, faced pressures related to their students' performance, with their employment sometimes hinging on student success. For instance, in Chicago, a school was nearing closure due to poor grades, prompting teachers to resort to dishonest practices to retain their jobs. While this behavior did arise from incentives, Levitt and Dubner's findings suggest that only around 5% of teachers engage in cheating, with honesty prevailing among the majority. A similar trend is observed with sumo wrestlers, who often cheat in response to dissatisfaction with their low incomes.
