Answer:
"Pets are sometimes treated excessively well or excessively poorly”:
- There are valid arguments on both sides of the statement above. This is largely due to the fact that each perspective can be justified and is completely true to some extent. To begin, many pets are spoiled... after all, they are animals. Nevertheless, they are creatures we cherish and nurture. They provide companionship and bring joy during our difficult times. Statistically, the average dog owner spends about $1,285 annually on their pet, whereas cat owners spend roughly $915 each year. This figure encompasses various expenses like pet toys and cat litter. In detail, Americans allocated $72 billion to pet care in 2018. Many pets receive treatment that rivals that of humans.
- Conversely, it can also be argued that pets endure cruel treatment. According to estimates from the Humane Society of the United States, almost 1 million animals fall victim to abuse or are killed during domestic violence incidents annually. Abuse occurs approximately once every minute. Nearly 65% of the animals mistreated are dogs. Over 10 million animals succumb to abuse every year within the US alone. This statistic represents just the United States; one can only imagine the global situation.
Most people believe that pets should be treated well and not subjected to ongoing abuse.
<span>
<span>In reference to the excerpt from F. Scott Fitzgerald's "Winter Dreams," I believe that the third option on the attached scale aptly captures the essence of the term priggish. I am confident that obnoxious is the most fitting description for the entire phrase, but you might want to verify in a dictionary. I hope this assists you with your homework.</span></span>
This is the excerpt from the poem. They had just finished the song for the third time when Squealer, with two dogs, approached, appearing to have something significant to announce. He declared that, due to Comrade Napoleon's directive, "Beasts of England" was now abolished and could not be sung anymore. The animals were surprised and questioned, "Why?" Squealer replied, "It is unnecessary, comrade. 'Beasts of England' represented the Rebellion, which has now concluded. The afternoon's traitor executions marked the final act. We have defeated both external and internal enemies. 'Beasts of England' expressed our hope for a better society to come. Now that society is established, the song serves no function." Although some animals might have protested, the sheep kept bleating, "Four legs good, two legs bad," drowning out the discussion. Thus, "Beasts of England" was no longer heard. Instead, Minimus, the poet, composed a new song that began: Animal Farm, Animal Farm, Never through me shalt thou come to harm! This was performed every Sunday morning after the flag was raised. Yet somehow, neither the lyrics nor the melody seemed to resonate with the animals like "Beasts of England" did. Minimus symbolizes the creators of state-sanctioned songs and slogans during Stalin's governance. Explanation: The excerpt is from "Animal Farm," a Utopian satire penned by George Orwell, published in 1945. It serves as a fable reflecting the Russian communist system during Stalin's regime and the betrayal associated with Joseph Stalin's actions. The satire illustrates how Stalinism undermined the ideals of the socialist revolution in the USSR. The poet Minimus introduces a fresh song that is sung on Sunday mornings.
Answer:
12 Aventon Street,
Birmingham.
September 15, 2020.
Dear Liam, hope you're doing well.
You won't believe it, but yesterday I turned into Superman for three minutes as I intervened to save a child from an armed assailant.
No jokes here; this was a serious situation. Despite my skinny frame, a surge of adrenaline kicked in, urging me to act and protect that young boy.
While heading home around six o'clock, I witnessed a dispute between a teenager and an older boy. I intended to stay out of it, when suddenly the older boy brandished a knife!
I reacted instinctively, which I'm grateful for because it likely saved the child’s life. After a struggle, I managed to overpower him, and with help from bystanders, we restrained him until the authorities arrived.
Forget my brief moment of heroism; I hope you’re having a great time over there.
Enjoy your weekend!
YOURS FAITHFULLY,
Aaron Connolly.
In this case, the verbs that align with the subject are "finish/take"
A verb in English is categorized as a term that indicates any action, event, or state of being. In essence, a verb signifies an action or a doing word.
Examples of verbs include dance, sing, walk, play, run, sit, clap, cheer, read, etc.
A subject refers to the individual, object, concept, or location that executes an action within a sentence.
Furthermore, subject-verb agreement pertains to the concordance between the subject and predicate in a sentence.
This means that a verb and its corresponding subject need to agree in terms of number or tense.
In this specific example, the verb finish (in present tense) is the most suitable since its subject (crowd) is singular (referring to each committee member). Likewise, the second part of the sentence should utilize the verb take (also in the present tense).
In summary, the verbs finish and take satisfy the subject-verb agreement in this scenario.
