Upon reaching Britain, Hastings and his concerns were mostly disregarded by British business circles. Through this exaggerated comment, Twain conveys that English society at that period was largely unsupportive and indifferent towards foreigners.
Read "What makes good people do bad things?", by MELISSA DITTMANN
Which statement best supports Zimbardo’s belief that individuals aren’t inherently “good” or “evil”?
A. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
B. “In one condition, they overheard an assistant calling the other students ‘animals’ and in another condition, ‘nice.’” ( Paragraph 8)
C. “The same social psychological processes… that acted in the Stanford Prison Experiment were at play at Abu Ghraib, Zimbardo argued.” ( Paragraph 16)
D. “As such, the Abu Ghraib soldiers' mental state… may have further contributed to their ‘evil’ actions, he noted.” ( Paragraph 18)
Answer: A. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
Zimbardo posits that the distinction between good and evil is not fixed, suggesting no one is born strictly into either category. Rather, everyone has the potential to traverse this boundary, particularly when influenced by specific situations. For instance, the mindset of the soldiers, combined with insufficient oversight and accountability, was involved in the mistreatment of an Iraqi prisoner at Abu Ghraib.
Answer:
In her introduction, Jahren makes rhetorical remarks regarding the significance of flora and her reluctance to study marine environments despite being in Hawaii.
She further discusses the various life forms present both on land and in aquatic settings, asserting that terrestrial life forms surpass those in water. The biologist feels that humans often overlook the vital role that trees and plants play in our ecosystems. She believes that while people coexist with plants, they often fail to recognize their existence.
Jahren poses a rhetorical question, urging her audience to observe what lies outside their windows.
Are they seeing plants? Or do they instead observe skyscrapers, structures, factories, and so forth? She posits that individuals often focus on artificial constructs at the expense of recognizing flora.
The biologist is apprehensive about the annual rate of deforestation without adequate replanting efforts. She approximates that over the last decade, around five billion trees have been removed, which she likens to the land area of France.
She emphasizes the urgency of her message by highlighting that every decade, the equivalent of one France is lost, with an estimated one trillion trees having been permanently eradicated due to significant logging activities.
Explanation:
A rhetorical question serves to elicit thought rather than requiring a direct response, enhancing dramatic effect.
The correct response is D. "It illustrates the reasons for why individuals ought not to..."