Hobbes and Locke, both English philosophers, recognized the concept of a "social contract" — that governmental authority stems from the people's consent. However, their perspectives on why individuals seek governance greatly diverged.
Thomas Hobbes articulated his political philosophy in Leviathan in 1651, a period marked by the turmoil of the English Civil War. He perceived humans as inherently distrustful, engaged in competition, and capable of malign behavior towards one another. Establishing a government, in his view, required sacrificing personal freedoms in exchange for protection against what would otherwise devolve into a state of constant conflict among individuals.
Conversely, John Locke released his Two Treatises on Civil Government in 1690, in the aftermath of the relatively peaceful power transition known as the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke posited that individuals are born as tabula rasa—without any prior knowledge or moral inclinations. As they experience life, they acquire knowledge about the optimal existence and thus choose to form governments to enhance societal conditions.
In my classroom discussions, I often explain their differing philosophies through an analogy to playground basketball. Hobbes argues that a referee is essential to prevent the players from descending into fierce arguments and violence, given the competitive nature of individuals. On the other hand, Locke believes that while a referee can improve the game by ensuring fair conflict resolution, it is possible to enjoy a match without one. It's important to note that both philosophers never referenced basketball, a sport invented in 1891 by James Naismith, but this analogy helps illustrate their contrasting ideas.
Answer:
The response relates to work that is skilled or specialized labor.
Explanation:
Initially, every individual in early societies was a generalist, primarily engaged in agriculture for subsistence. Crafting pottery and textiles was done for personal use or enjoyment. However, the emergence of these crafts gave rise to professional roles within the community. This advancement fostered innovation, increased productivity, enhanced the wealth of specialists, and led to the formation of distinct social classes.
When resources were plentiful, nations enjoyed stability and prosperity. They could engage in trade or use diplomacy to ward off invasions. However, scarcity of resources sparked competition and disputes, as groups sought to secure valuable materials for themselves. Therefore, abundant resources meant economic exchange and peace, while shortages led to increased risk and hostility for a country.
<span />
Answer:
1996 Â. Memorandum Pangkagawaran Blg.
46 S. 1996 (Abril 11, 1996)
Explanation:
This relates to CHED Memorandum Order (CMD) No. 59, S. 1996 and Resolution No. 96-2 (December 18, 1996).
This is part of the Laws for Implementing the National Language.
Government leaders are actively engaged in formulating and executing various Language Laws to promote the development of the National
Language Filipino.
According to Resolution No. 1-92 (May 13, 1992), amended by Resolution
No. 1-96 (August, 1996) from the Commission on communication among ethnic groups.
In terms of the Filipino Language, it is defined as "the native language utilized throughout the Philippines as the language of
Like other living languages,
Filipino undergoes development through borrowing from Philippine languages and foreign languages and evolves various lexical variations suited to different situations, social speakers, and topics of discussion and expression."
