A construction management company is examining its cash flow requirements for the next 7 years. The company expects to replace s

Answer:

Explanation:

Accounts receivable of 320,000 debit

Allowance                    600 credit

Sales total 900,000

1% estimated uncollectible:

900,000 x 1% = 9,000

The necessary adjusting entry will be for 9,000

As the calculated allowance corresponds to the sales of this period, we anticipate that 9,000 will be uncollectible in the upcoming period. It’s essential to acknowledge the entire sum now; otherwise, in a future period, we will incur bad debt expense for this previous period.

Recognizing the full amount aligns with the sales period, accommodating for any future uncollectible amounts arising from these sales

Answer:

The answer is option "C": ambiguous or conflicting expectations from stakeholders.

Explanation:

To ensure a project is successful, it is essential to understand the expectations of the company owners. If not, the team tasked with executing the project won't have a clear direction, enhancing the risk of project failure.

Answer:

c. strategic network.

Explanation:

The relationship detailed in the question exemplifies a strategic network. This concept involves the organized collaboration among independent firms, fostering enduring business relationships, communication, and cooperation among the network participants, which is precisely the situation between Toyota and its suppliers.

Answer:

Mary must submit official paperwork related to the merger or name change to the DSO, ensuring her records are updated.

Explanation:

Since the firm has merged and changed its name from XYZ Corporation to ABCXYZ Inc, Mary needs to draft a formal notification to her DSO regarding this change and the merger.

The DSO will then amend her records with the University of the Cumberlands.

Answer:

Option (D) is the right choice.

Explanation:

According to the Modigliani-Miller proposition, the cost of equity will adjust in a way to accommodate its debt obligations.

Cost of equity:

= WACC for an all-equity firm + (WACC for an all-equity firm - Cost of debt ) × (Debt-to-equity ratio)

Initially, when no debt was present,[ [TAG_20]]

WACC = cost of equity = 10%

The levered cost of equity:

= 10% + ( 10% - 6%) × 0.2

= 10.8%

Thus, Taggart's levered cost of equity would be approximately 11%.