I believe that American culture hasn't established a clear definition of what "normal" is, leading to a distorted view of Chris McCandless based on this.
Response:
I thought your account was deleted? Regardless, the answer is D. I took the test myself
Clarification:
The right choice is A. The author supplies data to illustrate the adverse effects of a poor diet.
Clarification:
In this part of the article, the writer emphasizes the detrimental impacts of unhealthy eating, indicating a strong belief in the necessity of a healthy diet and the negative outcomes of not adhering to it. Additionally, the author supports this notion with statistical evidence, evident in phrases like "Over a third of adults in the United States -- 37.5 percent -- are classified as obese" and "childhood obesity rates have tripled in the last three decades" as these quantitative details highlight the harmful outcomes tied to poor dietary choices. Thus, the author's argumentative method incorporates statistics to reveal the damaging effects of unhealthy eating habits.
Quindlen asserts that despite the diversity present, all American citizens form a united and strong nation. While this unity is indeed a beneficial aspect for the country, Quindlen points out that diversity can also lead to conflicts and inequalities among citizens, which not only has negative implications but also undermines the very ideals of freedom and equality that this nation was founded upon. Despite the apparent contrasts and contradictions these statements present, they ultimately reinforce Quindlen's position, as individuals tend to set aside their differences and come together in times of need to uphold the value of diversity across the nation.
<span>In argumentative writing, authors often acknowledge opposing points. This strategy shows readers that the writer has examined multiple viewpoints, making the argument appear more balanced. For example, the author admits that tablets can be expensive. However, it’s advisable to follow such concessions with counterarguments. Specifically, the author could provide evidence about the costs associated with textbooks, which are also costly and not easily updated, thus challenging the prior concession.</span>
