Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes. The premises are not true all of the time. T

Question

2 months ago

8

Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes. The premises are not true all of the time. T

he premises are likely to be true. The premises reinforce, or support, the conclusion. The conclusion follows logically from the premises. The conclusion comes from a different premise.

English

2 answers:

seraphim [7.4K] · Answer 1 · 2026-04-06T09:27:03+03:00

seraphim [7.4K]2 months ago

3 0

The premises are likely true. The premises provide support for the conclusion. The conclusion logically follows from the premises.

Naddika [7.4K] · Answer 2 · 2026-04-06T09:27:38+03:00

B). The premises are likely true. C). The premises provide support for the conclusion. D). The conclusion logically follows from the premises. Explanation: A valid argument is one in which the premises adequately support the truth and effectiveness of the conclusion. The valid arguments presented by the plaintiffs would include options B, C, and D. 'The premises are likely true' indicates a possibility of being false as well, which is a characteristic of inductive reasoning. 'The premises provide support for the conclusion' reflects that the premises are correspondingly related to the conclusion, making it considered valid or vice versa. 'The conclusion logically follows from the premises' asserts that the conclusion is a direct result of the premises. Therefore, options B, C, and D are the correct responses.