Was the argument put forth by the plaintiffs valid? Check all of the correct boxes. The premises are not true all of the time. T

Answer:

A)

At a superficial level, the narrator in the poem "The Parrot in the Cage" is identified as the parrot itself. At a deeper level, it reflects the poet or any contemporary individual.

B)

The parrot considers itself "twice born" as it has experienced two vastly different existences. Initially, it was born free in the wild, followed by a caged birth later on.

Explanation:

On a deeper level, the poet speaks of the feelings of modern individuals trapped by societal expectations to work and strive for more. People are required to engage in tasks they dislike, persevering even in states of exhaustion.

The two separate lives of the captive parrot signify its existence before and after being trapped. The first stage allowed for complete freedom in the forests, where it could eat, drink, chatter, and fly at will. The second phase commenced with confinement, leading to the inability to soar, sip fresh waters from streams, or enjoy luscious fruits from the forest.

These contrasting lives can mirror human existence, where childhood represents freedom, while adulthood is marked by being ensnared by societal obligations and expected to satisfy one's employer.

Additionally, we can view these two existences as reflective of humanity's past and present. In earlier times, individuals lived with greater freedom and satisfaction, whereas contemporary life demands relentless effort to meet societal standards. Humanity is no longer human; rather, they’ve transformed into machines.

The text lacks a section that addresses opposing viewpoints or a formal conclusion.

There are several prominent writers who achieved recognition partly due to their laziness, yet there are also numerous examples of individuals whose hard work led to significant success across various fields. Michael Jordan is often celebrated as one of basketball's greatest, known for his fierce competitiveness and meticulous nature. In the realm of writing, Ray Bradbury famously produced a short story each week—an impressive output. Numerous successful authors have implemented strict writing goals and schedules. Therefore, while the notion of minimizing productivity may have been beneficial for some, a strong emphasis on it has proven favorable for many others.

I find my opposing argument quite persuasive. The original author's claims rely heavily on anecdotes. The argument would hold more weight if there was substantial evidence supporting it. However, the prevalence of anecdotal evidence that contradicts the main argument actually diminishes the author's case and bolsters my counterargument.

Answer:

The responses are:

1. Judges should gain better insight into the adversities these children face, as they currently reject seven out of ten asylum applications from individuals undergoing deportation processes.

4. Enrique attempts to maintain his cleanliness by scouring for cardboard to use as bedding. He conserves some water from his bottle to wash his arms.

5. Two migrants are afraid to venture into town. They offer Enrique 20 pesos and request he buys food, promising to share it with him if he returns with it.

Explanation:

Both the editorial by Nazario and the biography depict the struggles of the immigrant children in a foreign land. They evoke feelings of empathy in readers for Enrique and other migrants from Central America.

The first point emphasizes the need for judges to acknowledge the hardships faced by children and approve their asylum claims for protection. The fourth point illustrates that both pieces convey the reality that Enrique sleeps on pieces of cardboard to avoid dirt and saves water for washing his arms. The fifth point highlights migrants who, out of fear, ask Enrique to buy food in exchange for 20 pesos.

Response:c

Rationale:

I mention this because as a weather forecaster, he needs to be cautious about his statements and apply logic in his predictions