Answer:
Explanation:
In the past month, the deaths of animals in captivity have raised ongoing concerns regarding conservation. Zoos serve as entertainment, and while they contribute to conservation efforts, they do not provide real solutions. Wildlife can only be preserved by empowering protection in their natural habitats — which necessitates collaboration with local communities rather than opposition against them.
For example, on May 28, 2016, Harambe, a gorilla born in captivity, was shot after a young boy fell into his enclosure at the Cincinnati Zoo in the United States. A week prior, two lions were euthanized at the Metropolitan Zoo in Santiago, Chile, and a week earlier, a Sumatran elephant named Yani died at the notorious Surabaya Zoo in Indonesia. Online discussions have exploded surrounding these heartbreaking incidents, but generally, the debate excludes the views of those most vital for success.
Zoo opponents like Marc Bekoff, a behavioral ecology expert and professor emeritus at the University of Colorado, argue that caged animals live a mere shadow of their experiences in the wild. Zoo proponents such as the World Association of Zoos and Aquariums contend that the conservation benefits zoos provide outweigh the isolated (albeit tragic) costs borne by the involved animals.
On social media, zoo advocates proclaim that captive animals act as 'ambassadors' for conservation on behalf of their wild counterparts, contending that zoos are a 'Noah's Ark' providing a buffer against the decline of endangered species. In truth, this narrative has effectively been abandoned by the zoo industry itself.
While some species such as oryx, wolves, and condors benefit from captive breeding programs, substantial evidence showing that genetic stocks bred in zoos actually bolster wild gorilla, elephant, and dolphin populations is lacking. Zoos recognize they lack sufficient space to engage successfully in breeding programs for large mammals and cannot accommodate more than a fraction of the 22,784 species globally that face the threat of extinction. So, why do zoos persist?
Zoos originated as entertainment venues, and although they have evolved, they still exist to generate revenue and cater to society's rich entertainment preferences. On a deeper level, they function as crucial components of a global conservation system that resembles historical colonial and racial dynamics of the West. This system operates on the belief that the communities in the regions where most endangered species reside represent issues needing resolution — frequently achieved by acquiring traditional lands, establishing camps, and creating experiences for affluent tourists, alongside employing armed guards to patrol parks and nature reserves.
I hope I was able to assist you!:)
