Hola. No proporcionaste los textos necesarios para responder esa pregunta. Los textos son:
Y cuando cada nueva ola de inmigrantes llegó, enfrentaron resistencia de aquellos que ya estaban aquí. Enfrentaron dificultades. Enfrentaron racismo. Enfrentaron burlas. Pero con el tiempo, mientras continuaban con sus vidas diarias, ganaban un sustento, formaban una familia, construían una comunidad y sus hijos asistían a la escuela aquí, contribuyeron a edificar una nación. –Presidente Barack Obama
Para aquellos en el Congreso que no creen que debamos hacer cumplir nuestras leyes, les haría esta pregunta: ¿Qué le dirían a la familia americana que pierde sus empleos, su ingreso, o a un ser querido porque Estados Unidos se niega a hacer cumplir sus leyes y proteger sus fronteras? Nuestra obligación es servir, proteger y defender a los ciudadanos de los Estados Unidos. –Presidente Donald Trump
Answer:
El discurso de Obama está lleno de un recurso retórico conocido como Pathos. A través de Pathos, el presidente intenta conmover a la audiencia para que sientan empatía por los inmigrantes. En esta charla, muestra cómo los inmigrantes forman parte del país y contribuyen a su desarrollo, a pesar de las adversidades que enfrentan. Por otro lado, el discurso de Trump también emplea Pathos para generar miedo hacia los inmigrantes. Menciona cómo algunas personas han sido afectadas emocional, económica y socialmente por la inmigración masiva en el país. Adicionalmente, utiliza Logos para argumentar que debido a los efectos negativos de la inmigración, es necesario que EE. UU. refuerce sus leyes de inmigración y fronteras.
PS. Logos es el recurso retórico que apela a la lógica.
Your inquiry lacks the context regarding Clover's response from the book "Animal Farm" and therefore is incomplete. The complete question alongside the passage follows.
Read the excerpt from Animal Farm:
As Clover surveyed the hillside, tears welled in her eyes. If she could articulate her thoughts, they would reveal that this was not their intended outcome when they envisioned overthrowing the human race years ago. These scenes of brutal violence were not what they had anticipated during that night when old Major inspired them to revolt. In her mind, she envisaged a future where animals would be liberated from hunger and tyranny, all treated equally, contributing according to their abilities, and ensuring the strong protected the weak just as she had guarded the lost brood of ducklings with her foreleg on the night of Major's address. Instead—though she couldn’t pinpoint why—they had arrived at a moment where no one felt safe enough to express their opinions, fierce dogs prowled everywhere, and comrades were torn apart after confessing to horrendous deeds. Rebellion or disobedience was unthinkable to her. Despite the current state of affairs, she knew they were far better off than in Jones's time, and above all, preventing the humans' return was essential. Whatever transpired, she vowed to stay loyal, work diligently, follow the assigned orders, and accept Napoleon's leadership. Yet, this was not what she and the other animals had aspired to achieve, nor was it for this reason that they built the windmill and faced Jones's gunfire. Those were her thoughts, encapsulated without words.
How does Clover’s response reinforce the author's intent? Choose three options.
- Orwell depicts Clover’s profound sorrow over the violence, akin to the sentiments expressed by Soviet citizens.
- Orwell illustrates that Clover held hopes similar to those of Soviet peasants, anticipating improvements in their lives.
- Orwell reveals that Clover realizes her mistake in trusting those in power to safeguard the vulnerable.
The line "Child as he was, he was desperate with hunger and reckless with misery." serves as my answer.
Answer:
It would feature flickering lights and darkness, creating a scene that evokes confusion and perhaps fear, revealing secrets that place a character in desperate need of assistance.
Explanation:
Having watched numerous horror films, I can relate to this.
