A lineman with 11 months on-the-job experience was electrocuted while working on grounded de-energized lines. He was working fro

Question

1 month ago

9

A lineman with 11 months on-the-job experience was electrocuted while working on grounded de-energized lines. He was working fro

m a defective basket on an articulated boom aerial lift when the basket contacted energized lines which ran beneath the de-energized lines. The defective basket permitted current to pass through a drain hole cut into the body of the basket, then through the employee, and to ground via the de-energized line. What could have been done to avoid this accident?
Select all that apply.
A. Guards or barriers should have been erected as necessary to adjacent energized lines.
B. Nothing could have prevented this type of accident.
C. The worker should have been instructed on how to recognize and avoid unsafe conditions and also on regulations that apply to their work environment.
D.A boom aerial lift wasn't the appropriate lifting device
E.Had an inspection or test occurred before starting work, the defect would have been noted.

Health

1 answer:

harkovskaia [1.5K] · Answer 1 · 2026-02-23T06:26:36+03:00

Answer:

C. The worker needed training on identifying and sidestepping unsafe scenarios, along with knowledge of relevant regulations in their work setting.

Explanation:

The question indicates that the worker was using a faulty basket on an aerial lift. This incident could have been averted if the defective basket had been addressed. Therefore, it is essential to assert that the worker should have been educated to recognize hazardous conditions that threaten their safety and well-being, emphasizing that they need guidance on identifying unsafe work environments as well as the pertinent regulations affecting their job site.