The term that completes the statement is <span>Emotional Dissonance. This concept refers to a type of organizational behavior in which employees </span>must display a certain emotion at work or in a professional setting, even if they are actually feeling a different emotion.
Answer:
Only 1) is correct since selective data reporting is generally not viewed as UNETHICAL in research practices, while data that does not exist is considered UNETHICAL.
Explanation:
Selective data reporting refers to the practice of presenting findings based on particular selections from a study, which can involve adjustments to the original hypotheses.
Non-existent data implies adding results that were not derived from the original research to the findings.
A political agenda encompasses a range of issues or matters that lawmakers and individuals outside the government prioritize at any moment. It is typically shaped by political authorities and influential figures but is also swayed by advocacy groups, lobbyists from the private sector, think tanks, judicial entities, and international occurrences. Various theories exist regarding who controls the political agenda, such as pluralist, elitist, and institutional theories, each with distinct foundational beliefs.
Another significant influence on the political agenda is the media. Research has demonstrated that when certain topics receive heightened media attention, such as through broadcasts or publications, they tend to become more prevalent in parliamentary discussions. Media exposure has been associated with the effectiveness of political parties in promoting their ideas on the agenda. However, this influence is not always immediate; there can be delays between decisions and their subsequent impacts, termed political agenda lag.
The political agenda is closely linked to the degree of state centralization. A more centralized government tends to encourage citizen engagement in influencing the agenda. Consequently, political leaders often prefer a decentralized structure to maintain tighter control over the political narrative.
The “Political Agenda Effect” suggests that diverse groups of citizens coming together will shift focus from elite interests to public welfare. Meanwhile, the “Escalation Effect” posits that collective citizen action may prompt elites to mobilize national resources against them, striving to maintain the agenda as they see fit.
The impact agenda reflects the growing demand for researchers to substantiate real-world ramifications of their work. This is linked with the political agenda since governments often evaluate positive impacts based on their prevailing political priorities. Regarding the development of the political agenda, three prominent models are frequently referenced: the outside initiative model, the mobilization model, and the inside initiative model.
