Answer: B. Businesses wielded excessive influence over employees
Explanation:Apex
Though I'm not drafting the two paragraphs, I can provide details about one specific case: Gibbons v. Ogden involved a federally issued permit versus a state (NY) issued permit for navigating New York waterways. The Marshall court reinforced Article VI (Supremacy), asserting that federal law overrides state law, while also bolstering the Commerce Clause's interpretation—that commerce encompasses not just the exchange of goods but also their transportation. This established that national Congress holds the exclusive power to regulate interstate commerce, thereby reinforcing federal authority over state governance. This case, among others, influences the understanding of federalism concerning its powers, rights, and responsibilities.
Each city-state maintained its own separate governments.
