Hobbes and Locke, both English philosophers, recognized the concept of a "social contract" — that governmental authority stems from the people's consent. However, their perspectives on why individuals seek governance greatly diverged.
Thomas Hobbes articulated his political philosophy in Leviathan in 1651, a period marked by the turmoil of the English Civil War. He perceived humans as inherently distrustful, engaged in competition, and capable of malign behavior towards one another. Establishing a government, in his view, required sacrificing personal freedoms in exchange for protection against what would otherwise devolve into a state of constant conflict among individuals.
Conversely, John Locke released his Two Treatises on Civil Government in 1690, in the aftermath of the relatively peaceful power transition known as the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke posited that individuals are born as tabula rasa—without any prior knowledge or moral inclinations. As they experience life, they acquire knowledge about the optimal existence and thus choose to form governments to enhance societal conditions.
In my classroom discussions, I often explain their differing philosophies through an analogy to playground basketball. Hobbes argues that a referee is essential to prevent the players from descending into fierce arguments and violence, given the competitive nature of individuals. On the other hand, Locke believes that while a referee can improve the game by ensuring fair conflict resolution, it is possible to enjoy a match without one. It's important to note that both philosophers never referenced basketball, a sport invented in 1891 by James Naismith, but this analogy helps illustrate their contrasting ideas.
Response:
could you provide more details
Indeed, as the UN report supports parts of the Sudan Tribune article. It verifies the kinds of attacks, torture, and violations of human rights that have taken place in Darfur. The report indicates that civilians were specifically targeted, but refrains from labeling these actions as genocide, contrasting with the Tribune article's assertion.
Then check the boxes indicating:
The UN report supports the article in certain aspects.
The UN report verifies the attacks and fatalities that occurred in Sudan.
<span>The UN report differs on whether these incidents can be classified as genocide.</span>
Answer:
The elements you seek are the draft and the count of lives lost.
Explanation:
Answer: The Portuguese trading posts in both regions aimed to enable Portuguese control over vital maritime routes
Explanation:
The Portuguese established trading posts in Africa and Asia primarily to dominate trade routes rather than expand their territorial claims. Developed by Portuguese navigators, over fifty fortified trading sites were placed strategically between West Africa and East Asia, enabling them to levy duties on merchant ships.
