Read "What makes good people do bad things?", by MELISSA DITTMANN
Which statement best supports Zimbardo’s belief that individuals aren’t inherently “good” or “evil”?
A. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
B. “In one condition, they overheard an assistant calling the other students ‘animals’ and in another condition, ‘nice.’” ( Paragraph 8)
C. “The same social psychological processes… that acted in the Stanford Prison Experiment were at play at Abu Ghraib, Zimbardo argued.” ( Paragraph 16)
D. “As such, the Abu Ghraib soldiers' mental state… may have further contributed to their ‘evil’ actions, he noted.” ( Paragraph 18)
Answer: A. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
Zimbardo posits that the distinction between good and evil is not fixed, suggesting no one is born strictly into either category. Rather, everyone has the potential to traverse this boundary, particularly when influenced by specific situations. For instance, the mindset of the soldiers, combined with insufficient oversight and accountability, was involved in the mistreatment of an Iraqi prisoner at Abu Ghraib.
The best statement that captures the allusion is that God uses the rainbow as a reminder of his vow to never again destroy all life on Earth. The correct option is letter C. The Covenant of the Rainbow assures that God will not permit another flood to wipe out all living beings.
1.) The first attempt was overly emotional, making it challenging to focus on the words. The second had a balanced emotion, which enhanced comprehension of the text.
2.) He made eye contact with the camera while presenting his soliloquy.
3.) Responses may differ.
The Fugitive Slave Act is the event that I believe prompted Stowe to write Uncle Tom’s Cabin.
The appropriate selections for each drop-down menu are these:
In the article "The Melting Arctic," persuasive methods are employed to influence public opinion. One technique used is scientific data, which depends on evidence presented through graphs, charts, and facts. Additionally, the article uses expert opinion, which means a recognized professional endorses a particular idea or viewpoint.
On the other hand, the NOAA video appeals to the audience's emotions by showing animals. It conveys passionate assertions about the deteriorating conditions in the Arctic and how these negatively impact wildlife.
The phrase "in contrast" signals that what follows opposes what has been mentioned before. Since the first paragraph emphasizes scientific evidence, the second should appeal to the opposite—feelings and beliefs. Among the adjectives provided, "passionate" is the only one positively matching "emotions."