[I]t is not feasible for the community to resolve all disputes that may arise directly.
Answer: Option D.
Explanation:
The assertion made in this option is backed up by an example provided by the author in the concluding passage. The case is illustrated where Peter wrongs Paul in the text.
This example illustrates the absurdity of believing that the entire community could effectively assess the details of the dispute and make a judgment regarding a contentious issue.
The diagram is included in the image below. A sentence diagram is quite straightforward; it resembles a cross, as depicted in the image provided. One arm of this cross holds the subject of the sentence, while the opposing arm contains the predicate. In the given sentence, there are two subjects: the word "you" is the first subject executing the verb "to protest," and the word "I" serves as the second subject with respect to the verb "to change," in a negative construction. The predicate encompasses everything stated about the subject, indicating the action executed by the subject. In the analyzed sentence, we discern two predicates: the action of "protesting" and the statement "I will not change my mind."
Sample response: The overarching lesson from the reading suggests that creating a useful product requires patience and persistence. It's necessary to test, fail, and revisit your ideas until you reach success.
Women and men complement each other effectively.
<span>People are compatible when they join together as companions.
</span>
Having companionship benefits individuals.
