Consider the market for white athletic socks, which consumers consider to be identical products. If the demand is very elastic a

nd the supply is very inelastic, how would the burden of a new tax on athletic socks be shared between consumers and producers? What if the situation were reversed – a very inelastic demand and a very elastic supply? How would that change the way consumers and producers share the burden of the new tax? Justify your answer.

Business

You might be interested in

INCOME STATEMENT Little Books Inc. recently reported $3 million of net income. Its EBIT was $6 million, and its tax rate was 40%

Katen [3525]

Answer:

The interest amounts to $1,000,000.

Explanation:

The standard format of an income statement includes:

Revenue/Sales (+)

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) (-)

=Gross Profit

Marketing, Advertising, and Promotion Expenses (-)

General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses (-)

=EBITDA

Depreciation & Amortization Expense (-)

=Operating Income or EBIT

Interest (-)

Other Expenses (-)

=EBT (Pre-Tax Income)

Income Taxes (-)

=Net Income

For this case:

EBIT equals $6,000,000.

The interest is to be determined.

Tax is calculated as 0.40.

EBITDA stands at $3,000,000.

The interest formula is: interest = [EBITDA / (1 - tax)] - EBIT

Substituting values, interest = 3000000 / 0.60 - 6000000 = -$1,000,000.

With EBIT at 6 million, the interest is $1 million, and the tax amounts to 2 million (calculated as (EBIT - interest) * 0.40).

Thus, the net income is $3 million.

7 0

3 months ago