The text lacks a section that addresses opposing viewpoints or a formal conclusion.
There are several prominent writers who achieved recognition partly due to their laziness, yet there are also numerous examples of individuals whose hard work led to significant success across various fields. Michael Jordan is often celebrated as one of basketball's greatest, known for his fierce competitiveness and meticulous nature. In the realm of writing, Ray Bradbury famously produced a short story each week—an impressive output. Numerous successful authors have implemented strict writing goals and schedules. Therefore, while the notion of minimizing productivity may have been beneficial for some, a strong emphasis on it has proven favorable for many others.
I find my opposing argument quite persuasive. The original author's claims rely heavily on anecdotes. The argument would hold more weight if there was substantial evidence supporting it. However, the prevalence of anecdotal evidence that contradicts the main argument actually diminishes the author's case and bolsters my counterargument.
The Germans would then seek alternative methods to transmit their communications.
John Brown was an American abolitionist who supported rebellion as a means to eradicate slavery in the United States. He faced charges of treason against the Commonwealth of Virginia for his unlawful actions, was convicted, and executed by hanging.
In the time leading up to his execution and following his conviction, a significant number of notable individuals campaigned financially and crafted speeches in his support. Notable amongst them was Ralph Waldo Emerson. Emerson depicted Brown as a relatable, ordinary person driven by strong beliefs to take action. This portrayal was meant to highlight Brown’s admirable qualities and generate empathy from the public by making a connection with themselves.
I thinks it's B but C can also be an answer but I would go with B
