Hello. The question is incomplete. The entire question reads:
"What entitlement [right] do we possess to take that land, which has been possessed by others for a long time...? "What is commonly shared among all is rightfully owned by none. [Native Americans] govern vast territories without any claim or ownership; they neither enclose land nor have livestock to maintain it.... So why shouldn't Christians be allowed to inhabit their unoccupied lands and forests (leaving them the areas cultivated for their crops)...? For God has granted humanity a dual entitlement to the earth; there exists a natural entitlement and a civil [political] entitlement. The initial entitlement was natural, when humanity occupied the land in common, each person planting and gathering as they wished. As populations of humans and livestock grew, specific pieces of land were enclosed [claimed as property]... Eventually, this led to civil entitlements."
Summarize briefly ONE argument made in the excerpt.
Answer:
Because Native Americans have not asserted their civil rights over their territory, it's claimed that the natural rights given by God to everyone allow Christians to rightfully take control of the land alongside the natives.
Explanation:
This passage shown in the earlier question was authored by John Winthrop, who was part of the initial English settlers in North America and later served as governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In this writing, Winthrop defends the colonizers' decision to inhabit America, despite it being a land already populated and owned by others. In this passage, Winthrop argues that God granted men a natural right over land, which was supposed to be common to all. Through their actions, men claimed civil rights to certain plots, becoming owners who could restrict others from utilizing it. Nonetheless, since Native Americans have never claimed civil rights to their territories, it legitimizes the application of natural law, permitting Christians to claim the land as their own.
France ranks first, possessing nuclear arms and having both signed and ratified the NPT. Pakistan ranks second, having conducted tests and asserting that it has nuclear capabilities, though it remains outside the treaty. Israel is listed as fourth due to its lack of official declaration and ambiguity surrounding its nuclear status, although suspicions suggest they may possess them. Iraq is placed third, as it was invaded over fears that Saddam's regime had nuclear weapons and would be prepared to use them.
Answer:
B. Companies refuse to employ individuals who ask for high salaries.
Explanation:
Karl Marx argued within his economic theory that capitalists fail to value workers and do not distribute profits among them. The decline in specialized labor leads to reduced wages.
Consequently, Marx anticipated that if companies deny employment to individuals demanding higher wages commensurate with their worth, this could instigate revolutionary change and potentially dismantle or replace free market systems.
Thus, the correct answer is "B. Companies refuse to employ individuals who ask for high salaries."
The Soviet Union and its satellite states declined the financial aid from the Marshall Plan. This initiative aimed to support nations in their recovery from World War II by supplying funds for economic stabilization and infrastructure rebuilding.
The Soviets realized that the United States intended to use these funds to forge alliances, which contributed to their refusal to accept it.
This refusal influenced the concept of containment, as the US sought to prevent European countries they aided with the Marshall Plan from adopting communist ideologies.
Answer;
City growth during the Gilded Age stemmed from several factors. Industrial expansion brought more jobs into urban areas, improvements in mass transit made cities more accessible, and abundant capital allowed wealthy industrialists to establish enterprises in cities. These developments attracted many immigrants seeking employment, which in turn fueled urban population increases.
