TRIPLE THE POINTS!!!!!!!!!!

1. The writer strongly argues against Flaherty, repeatedly asserting that under his leadership, nothing beneficial occurs and that the competitor offers more promise.

2. There is substantial emotional persuasion evident throughout. The author crafts the narrative to lead you to think, "this one individual is failing, while the alternative would surely be better. We should support him!"

3. The writer suggests that Digby is a superior candidate compared to Flaherty and implies that he can better manage the town.

4. D

5. C

(these are my best assumptions, hope this helps.)