Suzuki Supply reports the following amounts at the end of 2021 (before adjustment). Credit Sales for 2021 $ 260,000 Accounts Rec

Answer:

The interest amounts to $1,000,000.

Explanation:

The standard format of an income statement includes:

Revenue/Sales (+)

Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) (-)

=Gross Profit

Marketing, Advertising, and Promotion Expenses (-)

General and Administrative (G&A) Expenses (-)

=EBITDA

Depreciation & Amortization Expense (-)

=Operating Income or EBIT

Interest (-)

Other Expenses (-)

=EBT (Pre-Tax Income)

Income Taxes (-)

=Net Income

For this case:

EBIT equals $6,000,000.

The interest is to be determined.

Tax is calculated as 0.40.

EBITDA stands at $3,000,000.

The interest formula is: interest = [EBITDA / (1 - tax)] - EBIT

Substituting values, interest = 3000000 / 0.60 - 6000000 = -$1,000,000.

With EBIT at 6 million, the interest is $1 million, and the tax amounts to 2 million (calculated as (EBIT - interest) * 0.40).

Thus, the net income is $3 million.

Answer:

The calculations are presented below:

Explanation:

1.                       FIFO    LIFO Average cost  

Cost of goods sold      

Beginning inventory       $11,200      $11,200  $11,200

(400 units ×  $28)                          

Purchases                       $16,625    $16,625   $16,625

(475 units × 35)                  

Total goods available $27,825    $27,825   $27,825  

Ending inventory             $18,025    $15,575    $16,695

(525 units)  

Cost of goods sold          $9,800    $12,250    $11,130  

Calculated using ending inventory = 475 × $35 + 50 × $28    

FIFO = $18,025  

For LIFO ending inventory: 400 × $28 + 125 × $35

Results in $15,575  

Average cost is found by: $27,825 ÷ $875    

Which equals 31.8      

Ending inventory is calculated as 525 × 31.8

This leads to $16,695

2.                           FIFO            LIFO         Average

Sales

(307 × $50)                $15,350         $15,350    $15,350

Cost of goods sold     $9,800    $12,250    $11,130

Gross Profit                 $5,550           $3,100      $4,220

Expenses                     $1,680           $1,680      $1,680

Net income                  $3,870           $1,420       $2,540

3. FIFO ranks as 3

LIFO ranks as 2

Average ranks as 1

Answer:

The data indicates: One flight has a total of 100 seats.

Full fare passengers, ticket cost=$150, average=56 passengers, SD=23.

Discount fare passengers, ticket cost=$100, average=88 passengers, SD=44.

(a) The question suggests optimizing total revenue per flight (one way) by potentially only taking full fare passengers, which would yield $15,000. However, historical probabilities show an average of 56 with a standard deviation of 23, thus in an ideal scenario, total full fare passengers could reach 79. That would allocate 21 tickets for discount passengers, leading to total revenues of $13,950.

(b) Now with the new constrained policy, specific seat allocations for both categories are set—44 for discount (resulting in total revenues of 44*100) and 56 for full fare (resulting in total revenues of 56*150)—both within the previously mentioned probabilities. The total revenue in this case will be 44*100+56*150 = $12,800.

(c) The difference in excess revenues between both scenarios for optimal total revenues and limited seats policy is calculated as answer (a) - answer (b) = $13,950 - $12,800 = $1,150.

(d) Realistically, this question cannot be properly answered without a clear confidence interval. Another simplifying assumption is to take the mean number of passengers as expected bookings (which can later be adjusted with provided confidence intervals). The total revenues in this scenario will come from 44*100 from discount and 56*150 from full fare passengers. This remains similar to answer (c) due to the assumption of no constraints, so optimal bookings might total 54 full fare tickets and 44 discount tickets. Worst case scenarios could involve subtracting SD from each passenger type’s mean, or for better scenarios, add SD of full fare passengers to the mean and allocate remaining seats for discount fare in order to maximize revenue.

Response:

Year  Nominal wage  Real wage  Price level  Inflation rate

1                  $7                  $5                140             None

2                 $9                  $6                150               7.14 %

3                 $12                 $7.5             160              6.67 %

Explanation:

Note: A visual representation of the table is also provided.

The price level for Year 1 is calculated as (Nominal wage in year 1/Real wage in year 1) multiplied by 100.

Thus, Price level in Year 1 = ($7.00 / $5.00) * 100

Resulting in Price level in Year 1 = 1.4 times 100

Which gives Price level in Year 1 = 140

To find Real wage in Year 2: (Nominal wage in year 2 / Price level in year 2) multiplied by 100.

Which gives Real wage in Year 2 = ($9.00 / 150.00) * 100

Thus, Real wage in Year 2 = $6

To calculate Nominal wage in Year 3: (Real wage in Year 3 * Price level in Year 3) divided by 100.

As a result, Nominal wage in Year 3 = $1,200 / 100

Leading to Nominal wage in Year 3 = $12

To determine Inflation rate in Year 2: (Price level in Year 2 - Price level in Year 1) divided by Price level in Year 1.

Therefore, Inflation rate in Year 2 = 10 / 140

Giving Inflation rate in Year 2 = 0.0714, or 7.14 %

For Inflation rate in Year 3: (Price level in Year 3 - Price level in Year 2) divided by Price level in Year 2.

Response:

adgggrg

Justification: