Answer:
Isn't "corporate entrepreneurship" a contradictory term?
Many people might assume that corporations and entrepreneurs are entirely different, and mostly, they are correct. However, a few companies exemplify an entrepreneurial attitude or attempt to cultivate it. For instance, 3M is renowned for encouraging employees to allocate time for creative endeavors and innovation. Google is another major corporation that fosters such creativity among its workforce.
Do the established organization's traits, like routines and structural systems, enhance productivity while simultaneously stifling entrepreneurial zeal?
Corporate routines and frameworks do not merely stifle, but they effectively eliminate entrepreneurial energy and creativity. A notable illustration of this is found in the film depicting Ford's rivalry at Le Mans, which shows how corporate environments suppress unique thinking and actions.
Is it feasible for a firm to combine the advantages of both approaches?
It might be challenging, but achieving entrepreneurial spirit within a corporation is not out of reach. The hurdle lies in the belief that paying employees to spend time generating ideas is a frivolous expense. Creativity has associated costs, and not every organization is prepared to cover those expenses.
Answer:
40%
Explanation:
Total assets. $240,000
Less total liabilities ($130,000)
$110,000
Less common stock ($24,000)
Retained earnings at end $86,0000
Less Retained earnings at the beginning ($29,000)
Addition to retained earnings $57,000
Add dividends $6,400
Net profit earned $63,400
Add expenses $94,000
Revenue. $157,400
Therefore, company's net profit margin expressed as a percentage = Net profit earned / Revenue
= (63,400/157,400) × 100
[[TAG_37]]= 40%[[TAG_38]]
Response:
Hart's note is to be noted at $10,000 while Maxx's note is to be recognized at $7,820
Justification:
Hart's note, being a current note (maturing within a year), will be listed at future value = $10,000
On the other hand, Marxx's note should be reflected at its present value:
present value = future value x discount factor = {$10,000 [1 + (3% x 5)]} x 0.68
present value = $11,500 x 0.68 = $7,820
*simple interest is utilized to determine the future value of Marxx's obligation since Jet Co. does not apply compound interest
