answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vika
24 days ago
12

Gamma, Inc. has struggled for industry dominance with Ardent, Inc. its main competitor, for years. Gamma has gathered and analyz

ed large amounts of competitive intelligence about Ardent. It has observed as much of the firm’s internal functioning and technology as it can legally, yet Gamma cannot understand why Ardent has a competitive advantage over it. The source of Ardent’s success is:
Business
1 answer:
stepan [3K]24 days ago
5 0

Answer:

Casual Ambiguity

Explanation:

Analyzing the provided details, it appears that the foundation of Ardent's success is attributed to Casual Ambiguity. This term describes a scenario wherein it's nearly unfeasible to connect outcomes to their original states or origins. This is evident in Ardent's substantial success and its edge over rivals. Similar dynamics can be seen in the pricing trends of stocks, options, futures, and related financial products on markets.

You might be interested in
What made Sarah Butler decide to do the work she is doing?
arsen [2988]
Sarah Elizabeth Butler is a well-known actress in America, recognized, especially for her portrayal of Jennifer Hills in the popular film series I Spit on Your Grave. During her youth, she demonstrated a keen interest in the Arts through choir singing, participation in singing competitions, and performances in both community and high school theatre. She chose to leave college to focus on seeking a talent agent and began auditioning for roles in television and film, discovering a profound joy in acting.
3 0
17 days ago
Read 2 more answers
g Carnival Enterprises produced 8,000 completed units of a product. According to manufacturing specifications, standard hours fo
soldi70 [3150]

Result:

The direct labor rate variance is positive $3,400.

Details:

Here’s the information we have:

The total actual labor cost for the company was $200,600, which covered 17,000 direct labor hours. The standard cost per hour is $12.

To find the direct labor rate variance, we begin by determining the actual rate.

Actual rate = $200,600 / 17,000 = $11.8 per hour.

Now we can compute the direct labor rate variance:

Direct labor rate variance = (Standard Rate - Actual Rate) * Actual Quantity

Direct labor rate variance = (12 - 11.8) * 17,000 = positive $3,400.

This variance is favorable as the actual rate was less than the standard rate.

8 0
26 days ago
Global use of cell phones grew rapidly between 1989 and 2000. below is a scatterplot of the percentage of people in the world wh
Scilla [3267]

Answer:

Explanation:

A)

The formula for regression is,

ln(Cell Phone Subscribers) = -820.894 + 0.411704 Year

or,

Percentage of Cell Phone Subscribers = exp(-820.894 + 0.411704 Year)

For the year 2005,

Percentage of Cell Phone Subscribers = exp(-820.894 + 0.411704 * 2005)

= 96.79%

B)

The significance of the slope has a p-value close to 0 (0.000). Hence, the model holds statistical significance and its predictions are very reliable.

5 0
1 month ago
Darin was promoted, but it meant leaving the bustling city life he loved and moving to a different state in a quiet part of the
marusya05 [3096]
A represents the solution

I hope this is useful.
4 0
13 days ago
Pattup Company makes 40,000 units per year of a part that it uses in the products it manufactures. The unit product cost of this
Katen [2925]
-$64000. The calculation of the net total occurs as follows: Direct material = $11.30, Direct labor = $22.70, Variable manufacturing overhead = $1.20, Fixed manufacturing overhead ($24.70 - $21.90) = $2.80. The total relevant cost is derived from the sum of the direct material, direct labor, variable manufacturing overhead, and fixed manufacturing overhead totaling $38.00. The total cost associated with manufacturing is derived from relevant cost per unit multiplied by the number of units plus the opportunity contribution margin lost, calculated to be $1,784,000. The overall cost for purchasing stands at $1,848,000. Thus, the net total equals the total cost of making minus the total cost of buying, amounting to -$64000.
4 0
18 days ago
Other questions:
  • The Hawkins Supply company is currently faced with an inventory rotation problem. This difficulty stems from the fact that some
    6·1 answer
  • A price range at which technicians would expect a substantial increase in the demand for a stock is called
    12·1 answer
  • Holly uses a perpetual inventory system. Holly sells $3,500 of blue jeans. The customer later brings $420 of blue jeans back to
    8·1 answer
  • Barbara, a product manager at an organic soap manufacturing company, is supposed to interview a candidate for a new job opening
    8·1 answer
  • Suppose apartments are in four locations: Location A, Location B, Location C, and Location D. Location A is in the city, where y
    8·1 answer
  • Parker Lane Cafe currently has $160,000 in cash, $380,000 in inventory, and $40,000 in accounts receivable. The company also has
    15·1 answer
  • This month, a company receives $5,000 from a regular customer, of which $3,000 is for products delivered last month and $2,000 i
    14·1 answer
  • Blue Ridge Bicycles uses a standard part in the manufacture of several of its bikes. The cost of producing 43,000 parts is $140,
    10·1 answer
  • Mountain Foods is developing a new line of fruit-flavored salsas. It hires a firm to give away samples of salsa to customers and
    12·1 answer
  • Madeline spends all of her spare money on widgets, which cost $2 each, and gizmos, which cost $3 each. What is her opportunity c
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!