answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kaylis
2 months ago
5

He Fed increased the supply of US dollars at an average rate of 6 percent per year over the 1980-2005 period. Based on the theor

y of production capacity, if the Fed had instead increased the money supply at the rate of 7 percent per year during that period, given other policies.
A. The average inflation rate during 1980-2005 would have been one percentage point higher than it actually was in that period.B. The economy would have enjoyed a much higher level of output in the mid-2000s.C. The price level in 2005 would have been about 28 percent higher than what it actually reached in that year.D. The output of the economy in the mid-2000s would not have been very different from the levels it actually reached.
Business
2 answers:
Free_Kalibri [3.7K]2 months ago
6 0

Answer:

B. In the mid-2000s, the economy would have experienced a significantly higher output level.

Explanation:

This selection derives from the production capacity theory, suggesting that a rise in production resources correlates with increased industrial capacity among companies. Capital is a critical resource of production that grows alongside an increase in US dollar supply. An augmented money supply enhances the lending capacity of banks to businesses, thereby boosting their production capabilities.

If the reasoning were based on inflation theory, the outcome would differ. Inflation theory indicates that the average inflation rate ascends proportionately with an increase in the money supply, among other contributors to inflation rates.

Speculating that prices in 2005 would have been approximately 28 percent greater than the actual levels that year is quite uncertain. Option D is definitely incorrect because economic output increases as a result of an expanded production capacity stemming from a larger money supply.

Nady [3.6K]2 months ago
5 0

Answer: A. The average inflation rate during 1980-2005 would have been one percentage point higher than it actually was in that period.

B. The economy would have enjoyed a much higher level of output in the mid-2000s

Explanation:

If the Fed had raised the money supply by 1% more than it did, the average inflation rate would have surpassed what it actually was. This increase can be attributed to the presence of more currency within the economy, allowing individuals to purchase a broader range of goods and services, thus driving prices upward to accommodate this demand.

Moreover, the American economic output would likely have been elevated in the mid-2000s due to the accumulative impact of a higher money supply from preceding years. As demand for goods and services surged, companies would be compelled to enhance their production capacity. With a larger money supply, borrowing costs decrease, facilitating firms' access to loans for expansion and fulfillment of demand, ultimately boosting economic output.

You might be interested in
Shelby's annual take home pay is $51,000. What is the maximum amount that she can spend per month paying off credit cards and lo
marusya05 [3725]

Answer:

850 is the right choice

Explanation:

7 0
2 months ago
Read 2 more answers
You are a Director in the Andrews Corporation. Your boss called you to inform you that there is a proposed layoff in your depart
Mariulka [3825]

Answer:

Ensuring Shelia comprehends the economic reasoning behind staff layoffs.

Explanation:

Discussing layoffs and related communications is an uncomfortable matter not only for the employee facing termination but also for the individual tasked with conveying the news.

The main point to remember when addressing layoff-related topics is the difference between layoffs and termination due to performance issues. Layoffs are never indicative of someone's personal performance or errors; they are consistently linked to broader business circumstances, like necessary downsizing. Essentially, layoffs are fundamentally about economic matters impacting the organization.

This is why mentioning individual qualities during the layoff process is irrelevant, as the termination is not the employee's fault.

6 0
2 months ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Acme Direct Funding’s loan package contains an additional acknowledgment certificate with instructions for the Notary Signing Ag
    12·2 answers
  • The Hawkins Supply company is currently faced with an inventory rotation problem. This difficulty stems from the fact that some
    6·1 answer
  • Flower Company manufactures and sells a single product that has a positive contribution margin. If the selling price and variabl
    11·1 answer
  • A young man is the beneficiary of a huge trust fund 35 years ago. If they had set aside $25,000, how much will be in the trust n
    7·1 answer
  • what percentage of motorists have witnessed an act of aggressive driving in the past year, according to the Citizens For Roadsid
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following people is considered to be in the labor force? Select all that apply: Gina is a stay-at-home mom and volu
    12·1 answer
  • Junker’s Stash started the Year 2 accounting period with the balances given in the financial statements model shown below. Durin
    5·1 answer
  • Increasing the promotional budget for a product in order to increase awareness is not advisable in the short run under which of
    5·1 answer
  • On April 1, Year 1, a company realizes that one of its main suppliers is having difficulty meeting delivery schedules, which is
    5·1 answer
  • A manager observes that on average, 5 students per minute enter the campus cafeteria. 10% of the students that enter the cafeter
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!