Answer:
The elasticity of supply for hot cocoa calculated at 1.43.
(D) The coffee market's supply is less elastic compared to that of hot cocoa.
Explanation:
Applying the midpoint formula,
The elasticity of supply for hot cocoa is (change in quantity supplied/average quantity supplied) ÷ (change in price/average price).
The change in quantity supplied amounts to 101 - 31 = 70.
The average quantity supplied equals (101 + 31)/2 = 66.
70/66 yields 1.06.
The price change is 9.75 - 4.5 = 5.25.
The average price is (9.75 + 4.5)/2 = 7.125.
5.25 divided by 7.125 results in 0.74.
Thus, hot cocoa's elasticity of supply is 1.06 ÷ 0.74 = 1.43. The supply for hot cocoa is elastic since this value exceeds 1.
For coffee, the elasticity of supply computes to (73 - 31)/(73 + 31)/2 ÷ 0.74, which simplifies to 42/52 ÷ 0.74 = 0.81 ÷ 0.74 = 1.09. Coffee supply is regarded as elastic as well because its elasticity is above 1.
However, the supply of coffee is less elastic than that of hot cocoa since its elasticity value is lower than that for hot cocoa.
Answer:
To achieve a strong credit score, one must consistently manage debt repayments since they began borrowing.
Your friend is mistaken in thinking that everyone who made all payments on time within a single year has a high credit score, as this view overlooks prior years' activities.
Some individuals might have missed payments on earlier loans but managed to maintain timely payments in 2015. Although this can enhance their credit score, the score would still reflect a lower value due to previous behaviors that negatively impacted it.
a. Determine the initial investment tied to replacing the current grinder with the new one.
Initial investment = cost of the new grinder + installation costs of the new grinder - after-tax revenue from selling the old grinder + increase in net working capital.
Cost of the new grinder = $105,000.
Cost to install the new grinder = $5,000.
After-tax revenue from the old grinder = $70,000 - ($70,000 - {$60,000 x (1 - 52%)] x 40%} = $70,000 - $16,480 = $53,520.
Increase in net working capital = $40,000 + $30,000 - $58,000 = $12,000.
Thus, initial investment = $105,000 + $5,000 - $53,520 + $12,000 = $68,480.
b. Assess the incremental operating cash inflows related to the new grinder installation. (Remember to factor in depreciation in year 6.)
New grinder cash flows:
Year 1 = [($43,000 - $22,000) x (1 - 40%)] + $22,000 = $34,600.
Year 2 = [($43,000 - $35,200) x (1 - 40%)] + $35,200 = $39,880.
Year 3 = [($43,000 - $21,120) x (1 - 40%)] + $21,120 = $34,248.
Year 4 = [($43,000 - $12,672) x (1 - 40%)] + $12,672 = $30,868.80.
Year 5 = [($43,000 - $12,672) x (1 - 40%)] + $12,672 + $18,000 (NWC) + $19,934.40 (after-tax salvage value) = $68,803.20.
Old grinder cash flows:
Year 1 = [($26,000 - $11,520) x (1 - 40%)] + $11,520 = $20,208.
Year 2 = [($24,000 - $6,912) x (1 - 40%)] + $6,912 = $15,964.80.
Year 3 = [($22,000 - $6,912) x (1 - 40%)] + $6,912 = $15,964.80.
Year 4 = [($20,000 - $3,456) x (1 - 40%)] + $3,456 = $13,382.40.
Year 5 = $18,000 x (1 - 40%) = $10,800.
Incremental cash flows:
Year 1 = $34,600 - $20,208 = $14,392.
Year 2 = $39,880 - $15,964.80 = $23,915.20.
Year 3 = $34,248 - $15,964.80 = $18,283.20.
Year 4 = $30,868.80 - $13,382.40 = $17,486.40.
Year 5 = $68,803.20 - $10,800 = $58,003.20.
c. Determine the expected terminal cash flow at the end of year 5 from the grinder replacement.
Terminal cash flow = regaining net working capital + after-tax salvage value = $18,000 + $19,934.40 = $37,934.40.
d. Show a timeline displaying the relevant cash flows for the proposed grinder replacement decision.
Year 0 = -$68,480.
Year 1 = $34,600.
Year 2 = $39,880.
Year 3 = $34,248.
Year 4 = $30,868.80.
Year 5 = $68,803.20.
Sidewinder, Inc., has sales of $634,000, costs of $328,000, depreciation expense of $73,000, interest expense of $38,000, and a
arsen [2960]
Answer:
$154,050
Explanation:
The following shows how net income for the business is calculated:
Total Sales $634,000
Subtract: costs -$328,000
Subtract: depreciation -$73,000
EBIT -$233,000
Subtract: interest -$38,000
EBT 195,000
Subtract: tax(195,000 × 21%) -$40,950
Net income $154,050
The calculation involves deducting all costs, interest, and taxes from the total sales revenue to arrive at the net income.
To adjust for Rent Receivable:
Sanborn Company has a tenant paying $3,100 monthly for renting space. The tenant has outstanding rent for November and December, which results in a total Rent Receivable on December 31 of (3100*2) = $6,200
Consequently, the adjusting entry on December 31 should be recorded as follows:
Rent Receivable Debit $6,200
Rent Revenue Credit $6,200
(Reflecting adjustment for rent receivable)
