Marianne Moore’s “Poetry” is written in defense of poetry. In the excerpts, which three lines or phrases reflect Moore’s opinion
of what good poetry should be? . . . to discriminate against "business documents and school-books"; all these phenomena are important. One must make a distinction however: when dragged into prominence by half poets, the result is not poetry, nor till the poets among us can be "literalists of the imagination" —above insolence and triviality and can present for inspection, "imaginary gardens with real toads in them," shall we have it. In the meantime, if you demand on the one hand, the raw material of poetry in all its rawness and that which is on the other hand genuine, you are interested in poetry.
This poem by Marianne Moore has undergone multiple revisions by the author herself, reflecting her desire for clarity and precision. The initial version emerged in 1919, including 30 lines, which she later condensed to 13 lines in 1925. Ultimately, in 1967, she presented a final version that consisted of just 4 lines. This poem has faced much critique as it initially seems that the author expresses a disapproval of poetry. However, this interpretation arises because the final version does not provide insight into her true intention, whether she indeed disapproves of all poetry. After thorough examination, it becomes apparent that Moore's real critique is directed not towards all poetry but specifically to the kind that prioritizes intellect over imagination, resulting in convoluted expressions that leave readers confused. She defends what she considers to be quality poetry—where imagination triumphs over intellect, enabling readers to genuinely feel what the author aims to convey. This is illustrated in the excerpt stating: "nor till the poets among us can be "literalists of the imagination" - above insolence and triviality and can present for inspection, "imaginary gardens with real toads in them," shall we have it."
This passage originates from the Greek Myth 'Echo and Narcissus'.
Explanation:
In the fifth paragraph of the myth "Echo and Narcissus", the viewpoint shifts momentarily from Echo to Narcissus' viewpoint.
Overall, the story is told from Echo's perspective, but this specific paragraph reveals his self-obsession. This insight helps readers grasp the dynamics between the characters more effectively.
While Echo loves Narcissus, he shows no interest in her. Echo continues to yearn for Narcissus until she ultimately fades away, leaving just her voice behind. Meanwhile, Narcissus pauses at a pond to drink water, and upon seeing his own reflection, he becomes utterly enamored with himself. Unable to seize his image, he remains by the water until he succumbs to starvation.
B. "The kind of sugar easiest to produce from cane is dark"
D. "wanted it to be as pure, sweet, and white as possible"
Explanation:
This information most convincingly suggests that white sugar was not only less common but also more valuable than brown sugar. If producing dark or brown sugar is simpler, it logically follows that its value would be lower. The description of white sugar as pure and sweet elevates its worth above that of brown sugar.
