Answer:
$311,100
Explanation:
Solution
Let's remember the following details:
The assumption is that Chester Corp has reduced its workforce by = %
The estimated cost of exit interviews = 100
Normal separation expenses = $5000
Now,
The total number of employees = 305
The reduction in workforce = 20%
So,
The number of employees being laid off = 305 x 20% = 61 individuals
Thus,
The separation expense per employee = $5000
Cost for exit interviews = $100
Total expense per individual = $5,100
Now,
The overall separation cost = 61 individuals x total separation cost per employee
That is,
= 61 x 5100 = $311,100
Answer:
ingresos/anualmente - costos/anualmente - impuestos = ganancias
Explanation:
20 horas/semana en un año tiene 4 semanas; 20*52=1040 horas/año
8 horas/1 domingo al año; trabaja solo 12 domingos; 8h*12=96h
$9/hora de ingresos
$1000 costos fijos
$1500 en viajes
20% de impuestos
1040+96= 1136 horas/año
1136*9= 10224 $/año en ingresos totales
10224-1000-1500=7724 ganancias antes de intereses e impuestos
7724*(1-0.20)=6179.20 ganancias netas
Opportunity cost is defined as the loss incurred when one chooses one alternative over another.
In this scenario, the forgone option is full-time work along with other costs associated with that period when opting for schooling instead. Room and board expenses remain constant whether attending school or working full time, thus these are not factored in. Earnings from part-time work during school are deducted as they would have been earned during full-time employment.
Thus;
Opportunity cost = $20,000+$10,000+$1,000-$8,000 = $23,000
A case of delayed purchasing occurs when you're billed for a hot tub over 39 weeks while receiving the hot tub immediately. This resembles a car loan where you pay for the vehicle over time but can drive it home right after purchase. Therefore, the right answer is B.
Answer:
1. He has yet to advance the concept
2. His boss is aware of his pacifist beliefs, so Ben faces the dilemma of whether it is ethically sound to create a product potentially usable for warfare.
Explanation:
In this case, Ben has entered into a contract with his employer stating that all concepts he formulates during his employment are owned by the company.
Such agreements are standard practice and grant companies rights over the innovations created by their staff.
Despite this, Ben's pacifism presents an ethical conflict as he contemplates an idea that might turn an ultrasonic range-finding device into a weapon.
He defends his stance by asserting that no development on this idea has occurred and believes his employer will not press him to work on such technology given his pacifist views.
