1. "The limit on John's credit card is defined by the function f(x)=15,000+1.5x," indicating that if John's monthly income is $5,000, he can spend a maximum of f(5,000)=15,000+1.5*5,000=15,000+ 7,500=22,500 (dollars). As another example, if John's monthly income is $8,000, then he can spend up to f(8,000)=15,000+1.5*8,000=15,000+ 12,000=27,000 (dollars). 2. If we consider the maximum amount John can spend as y, it can be represented as y=15,000+1.5x. To express x, the monthly income, in terms of y, we rearrange this equation: y=15,000+1.5x results in 1.5x = y-15,000. Therefore, in functional notation, x is a function, referred to as g, based upon y, the maximum sum. Generally, we denote the variable of a function by x, so we redefine g as: This tells us that if the maximum amount that John can spend is $50,000, then his monthly income would be $23,333. 3. If John's limit is $60,000, his monthly income equals $30,000. Note: g is deemed as the inverse function of f because it reverses the actions of f.
The test statistic (Z) is 2.5767, and the p-value of the test is 0.009975. The null hypothesis suggests that the smoking rate among students has not changed, while the alternative indicates otherwise. The z-statistic for the sampled proportion is computed, yielding z ≈ 2.5767. As we investigate whether the smoking percentage has shifted over the preceding five years, the two-tailed p-value is found to be 0.009975. This result is significant at a 99% confidence level, demonstrating substantial evidence that the percentage of smoking students has changed.
