The choice that most accurately represents the argument of Thoreau is the third option. It effectively uses his personal experience of civil disobedience to establish credibility. I hope my response is helpful. God bless, and have a great day!
<span>In argumentative writing, authors often acknowledge opposing points. This strategy shows readers that the writer has examined multiple viewpoints, making the argument appear more balanced. For example, the author admits that tablets can be expensive. However, it’s advisable to follow such concessions with counterarguments. Specifically, the author could provide evidence about the costs associated with textbooks, which are also costly and not easily updated, thus challenging the prior concession.</span>
