In at least one hundred words, compare and contrast David Lance Goines’s perspective of the Vietnam War as it is presented in “L

Answer:

When comparing David Lance Goines's viewpoint on the Vietnam War in "Let Sleeping Dogs Lie" with Janice Mirikitani’s perspective in "Attack the Water," both authors share the stance of wanting to avoid participation in the war. This reflects a mutual desire to steer clear of its involvement. However, their motivations differ. In "Let Sleeping Dogs Lie," characters’ reluctance stems largely from personal fears such as dread of combat and feeling unprepared physically or mentally. Meanwhile, in "Attack the Water," the opposition arises from broader circumstances: the region faces water scarcity along with a war-torn environment marked by violence and devastation. Thus, while both reject the war, the reasons range from individual apprehension to harsh societal conditions caused by conflict.

A significant underlying idea in "Let Sleeping Dogs Lie" targets the Vietnam War and the resulting deaths. Goines employs emotional irony and satire to criticize the US Government, particularly mocking the draft system, portraying it as a farce. In contrast, "Attack the Water" reveals the struggles endured by Vietnamese people and Japanese-Americans during the era of Japanese internment camps. Both Goines and Mirikitani denounce war and seek to encourage readers to reflect critically. While Goines uses humor and ridicule to highlight human folly and urge change, Mirikitani emphasizes the harsh realities and suffering caused by war.