Each of the three poems revolves around the theme of money.
Explanation:
1. In Avarice, the poem begins by directly addressing “Money” as if it is a living entity, implying that it has been almost humanized through worship in place of God. The focus here is on avarice, with the poet describing money as something extracted from filthy mines.
2. In 'The Good Life' , the poet discovers solace in constant hunger, which is quite unusual. The poet likens money to a beloved who left to fetch milk but failed to return. She mentions that her money has simply disappeared.
3. In 'Money', the poet reflects on the significance of money to individuals. Beyond just aiding survival, money is viewed as an obsession.
John Muir presents a convincing case for protecting the redwoods. He uses logical evidence about their destruction, demonstrating his expertise through knowledge of the trees’ history. Additionally, he stirs readers’ emotions with powerful language to inspire them to help preserve the forests.
Response: The two complex sentences are:
Due to the inadequacy of general ventilation in maintaining control, we strongly advise that additional fans and vent systems be installed at all welding locations.
As individual team members will initially be accountable for their own safety, ensuring that welders receive proper instruction and training regarding these controls is essential.
Clarification:
A sentence is regarded as complex when it comprises one independent clause and at least one dependent clause. An independent clause is a set of words that can function autonomously as a complete sentence. Conversely, a dependent clause fails to communicate a complete thought and cannot exist independently.
In the aforementioned sentences, the second and last ones qualify as complex sentences. They both commence with a dependent clause incapable of being a standalone statement, followed by an independent clause.
The poem presented illustrates freedom as an inherent force within nature. Yet, similar to natural phenomena, freedom can manifest with destructive and violent consequences that may suppress those who stand against its aims.
When freedom displays its might and wrath, those in need of it often feel intimidated and reject its influence. Conversely, when freedom retreats and its intensity decreases, disorder ensues, jeopardizing its survival, prompting those who shun freedom to demand its return.
Consequently, the poem conveys that freedom is immensely powerful, impactful, and can involve violent outcomes, yet it remains essential and unavoidably needed.
Various wars and battles, including Gettysburg, are remembered through monuments or statues, with some locations designated as national parks. This perspective counters Carl Sandburg's observation from his poem "Grass" (1918), where he states, "I am the grass; I cover all." Here, the poet suggests that society forgets wars and battles, referring to "all" as the fallen from many conflicts. The grass symbolizes nature's ability to conceal the pain and errors of humanity, implying that over time, visitors will ask simple questions about the places of war without remembrance of the past tragedies. Sandburg's outlook tends to be grim, suggesting that nature will obscure human errors, which will likely be repeated as they fade from memory. The recurrence of such mistakes is highlighted by Sandburg mentioning historical battles such as "Austerlitz", "Waterloo", and "Gettysburg". Hence, for Sandburg, the existence of memorials might hold little significance as humanity is prone to forget and engage in warfare again, ultimately treating war as inconsequential, simply "shoveling the bodies under the grass."
