President Obama was of the opinion that music embodies a nation's achievements within the realm of creativity.
Explanation:
He articulated that creativity has "always been pivotal in the life of our nation" during an inspiring address celebrating the 50th anniversary of the National Endowment for the Arts and the Humanities. He urged the audience to acknowledge and celebrate the creative spirit of America.
- He expressed his view that music serves as a reflection of national success in the creative arena, as evidenced by his movements to jazz music during a performance at the White House.
- He discussed how life transforms into lyrics and highlighted the necessity of possessing creative instincts as a fundamental aspect for a nation to thrive both as an artistic entity and as a country.
Answer:
B. "The kind of sugar easiest to produce from cane is dark"
D. "wanted it to be as pure, sweet, and white as possible"
Explanation:
This information most convincingly suggests that white sugar was not only less common but also more valuable than brown sugar. If producing dark or brown sugar is simpler, it logically follows that its value would be lower. The description of white sugar as pure and sweet elevates its worth above that of brown sugar.
Response: I would opt for B, but C could also work.
Rationale:
The choice of using first, second, or third-person perspectives in any kind of literary writing, whether it be fiction or non-fiction, is dependent on the author's intent and the goals of the piece. There are distinctions between academic and non-academic writing that influence a writer's decision to use these perspectives for presenting viewpoints.
Firstly, employing the first-person perspective enables the author to share personal opinions with the audience, creating an intimate connection with them. The issue arises in academic contexts, where the first-person voice tends to be very subjective. Academic writing, particularly essays, must present ideas not as personal thoughts, but as broader viewpoints to be taken seriously.
Conversely, the third-person narrative promotes a sense of objectivity, as it presents information as factual and verifiable rather than grounded solely in the writer's thoughts. However, solely relying on this perspective can render the work too clinical, limiting the reader's connection to the author and the material.
This is why integrating both first and third-person voices enriches Cooper's essay; it allows readers to experience both closeness to the author's feelings and the assurance of factual accuracy. Cooper balances personal expression with verifiable evidence, presenting her arguments in a more relatable and accessible manner.
