<span>Carol purchased the house for $234,900, and since a 10 percent deposit is required, the amount she needs to put down is $23,490.</span>
Hello. The question is incomplete. The entire question reads:
"What entitlement [right] do we possess to take that land, which has been possessed by others for a long time...? "What is commonly shared among all is rightfully owned by none. [Native Americans] govern vast territories without any claim or ownership; they neither enclose land nor have livestock to maintain it.... So why shouldn't Christians be allowed to inhabit their unoccupied lands and forests (leaving them the areas cultivated for their crops)...? For God has granted humanity a dual entitlement to the earth; there exists a natural entitlement and a civil [political] entitlement. The initial entitlement was natural, when humanity occupied the land in common, each person planting and gathering as they wished. As populations of humans and livestock grew, specific pieces of land were enclosed [claimed as property]... Eventually, this led to civil entitlements."
Summarize briefly ONE argument made in the excerpt.
Answer:
Because Native Americans have not asserted their civil rights over their territory, it's claimed that the natural rights given by God to everyone allow Christians to rightfully take control of the land alongside the natives.
Explanation:
This passage shown in the earlier question was authored by John Winthrop, who was part of the initial English settlers in North America and later served as governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. In this writing, Winthrop defends the colonizers' decision to inhabit America, despite it being a land already populated and owned by others. In this passage, Winthrop argues that God granted men a natural right over land, which was supposed to be common to all. Through their actions, men claimed civil rights to certain plots, becoming owners who could restrict others from utilizing it. Nonetheless, since Native Americans have never claimed civil rights to their territories, it legitimizes the application of natural law, permitting Christians to claim the land as their own.
Answer:
Who was Fitzhugh?
George Fitzhugh served as a political intellectual for the South and authored two significant works: Sociology for the South and Cannibals All! which promoted pro-slavery ideas.
Which of Fitzhugh’s points did you find most unsettling?
Among the many controversial points raised by George Fitzhugh, the one that I find most troubling is:
'It is the responsibility of society to protect the weak;' however, effective protection requires the exertion of control; thus, 'It is society's duty to enslave the weak.'
Explanation:
This quote from Cannibals All! illustrates Fitzhugh's strong pro-slavery stance. I personally find this perspective disturbing because every individual, regardless of their race, should have the opportunity to lead an independent life, yet he deemed individuals inferior based solely on skin color.
I think the following statements are relevant:
<span>- New industrial technologies enhanced transportation methods.
- The advancements in industry created tension between Europe and North America.
I appreciate you sharing your query. I hope this response proves helpful. Don't hesitate to ask more questions here.
</span>
C) The caste system defined people's jobs based on their caste. D) A dominant patriarchal system emerged, which diminished women's status in society. These characteristics exhibit the strong impact of Hindu beliefs on society during the Gupta era. Hindu beliefs evolved over a considerable duration in the subcontinent, where many of these concepts are ancient. However, Hinduism as a whole started to develop post the Vedic period (1500-500 BCE) and saw significant growth throughout the Medieval period. These beliefs contributed to numerous social structures observed during the Gupta period, like the caste system and patriarchal system.
