Answer:
The primary distinction between Wood's and Bailyn's views on the American colonies' rebellion against Britain is:
According to Wood, the rebellion stemmed from a reasoned understanding. Colonists perceived themselves as "inheritors of freedom" who included freedom in their daily lives. Conversely, Bailyn attributes the revolt to the rise of conspirators challenging their liberties.
Explanation:
Wood's and Bailyn's perspectives on the reasons behind the American colonies' uprising against Britain are expressed in their excerpts. Their varying viewpoints are clear.
Wood argues the rebellion was not prompted by hardship, but rather based on a "reasoned principle". In contrast, Bailyn suggests that the insurrection was fueled by conspirators opposing freedom.
Answer:
Political debates were promoted.
Explanation:
The philosophical movement known as humanism emerged during the Renaissance period and fostered political discussions across Europe.
The thinkers of humanism focused on human experience in their philosophical discussions, which led them to challenge certain power structures that they viewed as disrespectful to human dignity.
However, these discussions were not particularly transformative, and significant political change would only occur during the Enlightenment.
Hobbes and Locke, both English philosophers, recognized the concept of a "social contract" — that governmental authority stems from the people's consent. However, their perspectives on why individuals seek governance greatly diverged.
Thomas Hobbes articulated his political philosophy in Leviathan in 1651, a period marked by the turmoil of the English Civil War. He perceived humans as inherently distrustful, engaged in competition, and capable of malign behavior towards one another. Establishing a government, in his view, required sacrificing personal freedoms in exchange for protection against what would otherwise devolve into a state of constant conflict among individuals.
Conversely, John Locke released his Two Treatises on Civil Government in 1690, in the aftermath of the relatively peaceful power transition known as the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke posited that individuals are born as tabula rasa—without any prior knowledge or moral inclinations. As they experience life, they acquire knowledge about the optimal existence and thus choose to form governments to enhance societal conditions.
In my classroom discussions, I often explain their differing philosophies through an analogy to playground basketball. Hobbes argues that a referee is essential to prevent the players from descending into fierce arguments and violence, given the competitive nature of individuals. On the other hand, Locke believes that while a referee can improve the game by ensuring fair conflict resolution, it is possible to enjoy a match without one. It's important to note that both philosophers never referenced basketball, a sport invented in 1891 by James Naismith, but this analogy helps illustrate their contrasting ideas.
Could it be the telegraph?
At the lowest employment level, only one hundred and seven (107) million Americans were working in non-agricultural positions.
Employment rates began to consistently improve after hitting their lowest in 2010.
In 2010, the labor market in the United States was weak, having experienced deterioration for the preceding two years.
It was during the first quarter that the unemployment rate and levels began to decrease.
By the end of 2010, only 14.8 million individuals were unemployed, resulting in a decrease in the unemployment rate by 9.6 percent.
The labor force's unemployed and employed individuals were maintained in 2010.
