Response:
$22,419,192.19
Detailed explanation:
Utilizing an Excel sheet, I calculated the future payments and their present worth. If the annual payments rise by $450,000 each year, then the second payment will amount to $1.9 million, not $1.7 million.
Year Payment
0 $1,000,000
1 $1,450,000
2 $1,900,000
3 $2,350,000
4 $2,800,000
5 $3,250,000
6 $3,700,000
7 $4,150,000
8 $4,600,000
9 $5,050,000
10 $5,500,000
Present worth = $22,419,192.19
$8,400
The calculation for the annual financial benefit (loss) for the organization is detailed below:
Particulars Make Buy
Direct material $53,600 (8,000 units × $6.70)
Direct labor $64,800 (8,000 units × $8.10)
Variable manufacturing overhead $8,800 (8,000 units × $1.10)
Supervisor's salary $16,000 (8,000 units × $2)
Fixed manufacturing overhead $2,000
Opportunity cost $16,000
Purchase cost $169,600 (8000 × $21.20)
Total relevant cost $161,200 $169,600
Financial (loss) is = $161,200 - $169,600 = -$8,400
We simply compared the make and buy costs and found that purchasing incurs a higher cost than manufacturing, leading to an excess expense of $8,400 if the external supplier is chosen.
1) The minimum average total cost occurs when Ted catches and processes 2,000 fish, leading to a cost of $45 per fish. 2) When the market price is set at $51 per fish, Ted's optimal output is 3,000 fish, yielding a profit of $12,990. 3) At a market price of $45 per fish, Ted would again produce 2,000 fish but would not earn any profit.
Justin's company needs to be ready to show that it meets ISO 14001 standards. This indicates that they adhere to the protocols associated with environmental management, concentrating on minimizing their ecological impact and diminishing waste, while also fostering sustainability in their practices. ISO 14001 is designed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to aid in lessening environmental effects, curtailing waste, and enhancing sustainability in the environment. It outlines the requirements for a solid environmental management system (EMS) by offering a framework that can be followed.
The price of coffee beans decreases while their quantity increases. The exceptionally favorable weather leads to a greater harvest of coffee beans, thus expanding the supply curve to the right. This results in a lower price for coffee beans, which consequently boosts the quantity sold. Additionally, a decrease in coffee bean prices results in an increased supply of coffee cups, which in turn reduces their price while elevating the quantity of coffee cups sold. Given that coffee cups and donuts are complementary products, the decreased coffee bean prices stimulate a rise in demand for donuts, elevating both the price and quantity of donuts sold.