The choices for this inquiry are not provided; here is the section that is absent:
What two kinds of departmentalization can be seen in this instance?
A. Product and customer
B. Product and geographical
C. Customer and geographical
D. Functional and customer
E. Geographical and functional
The correct response to this query is B. Product and geographical
Explanation:
Departmentalization is the process of forming departments, units, etc., within businesses to enhance goal achievement and allocate roles and tasks. This can occur based on various factors such as geography, products, or functions.
In the situation of Spicy Dish, a distinct geographical departmentalization is apparent since the distributor has organized units according to location, allowing the company to have a unit in every significant geographical area like North America, Europe, etc. Additionally, this firm has established units according to products as it has created two distinct units in North America, with each focusing on a different product (beans/salsa.)
Karen dividió su comisión a partes iguales con su corredor, por lo que ella recibe:
Comisión de Karen = $3,522.75 × 0.5 = $1,761.375
El corredor de Karen se llevó el 55 % del total de la comisión, por lo que Karen obtiene solo el 45 % del total. Entonces, la comisión total debe ser:
Comisión total = $1,761.375 ÷ 0.45 = $3,914.17
Con una tasa del 7 %, el precio de venta del inmueble es:
Precio de venta = $3,914.17 ÷ 0.07
<span>Precio de venta = $55,917</span>
a. Determine the initial investment tied to replacing the current grinder with the new one.
Initial investment = cost of the new grinder + installation costs of the new grinder - after-tax revenue from selling the old grinder + increase in net working capital.
Cost of the new grinder = $105,000.
Cost to install the new grinder = $5,000.
After-tax revenue from the old grinder = $70,000 - ($70,000 - {$60,000 x (1 - 52%)] x 40%} = $70,000 - $16,480 = $53,520.
Increase in net working capital = $40,000 + $30,000 - $58,000 = $12,000.
Thus, initial investment = $105,000 + $5,000 - $53,520 + $12,000 = $68,480.
b. Assess the incremental operating cash inflows related to the new grinder installation. (Remember to factor in depreciation in year 6.)
New grinder cash flows:
Year 1 = [($43,000 - $22,000) x (1 - 40%)] + $22,000 = $34,600.
Year 2 = [($43,000 - $35,200) x (1 - 40%)] + $35,200 = $39,880.
Year 3 = [($43,000 - $21,120) x (1 - 40%)] + $21,120 = $34,248.
Year 4 = [($43,000 - $12,672) x (1 - 40%)] + $12,672 = $30,868.80.
Year 5 = [($43,000 - $12,672) x (1 - 40%)] + $12,672 + $18,000 (NWC) + $19,934.40 (after-tax salvage value) = $68,803.20.
Old grinder cash flows:
Year 1 = [($26,000 - $11,520) x (1 - 40%)] + $11,520 = $20,208.
Year 2 = [($24,000 - $6,912) x (1 - 40%)] + $6,912 = $15,964.80.
Year 3 = [($22,000 - $6,912) x (1 - 40%)] + $6,912 = $15,964.80.
Year 4 = [($20,000 - $3,456) x (1 - 40%)] + $3,456 = $13,382.40.
Year 5 = $18,000 x (1 - 40%) = $10,800.
Incremental cash flows:
Year 1 = $34,600 - $20,208 = $14,392.
Year 2 = $39,880 - $15,964.80 = $23,915.20.
Year 3 = $34,248 - $15,964.80 = $18,283.20.
Year 4 = $30,868.80 - $13,382.40 = $17,486.40.
Year 5 = $68,803.20 - $10,800 = $58,003.20.
c. Determine the expected terminal cash flow at the end of year 5 from the grinder replacement.
Terminal cash flow = regaining net working capital + after-tax salvage value = $18,000 + $19,934.40 = $37,934.40.
d. Show a timeline displaying the relevant cash flows for the proposed grinder replacement decision.
Year 0 = -$68,480.
Year 1 = $34,600.
Year 2 = $39,880.
Year 3 = $34,248.
Year 4 = $30,868.80.
Year 5 = $68,803.20.
