Answer:
Ensuring Shelia comprehends the economic reasoning behind staff layoffs.
Explanation:
Discussing layoffs and related communications is an uncomfortable matter not only for the employee facing termination but also for the individual tasked with conveying the news.
The main point to remember when addressing layoff-related topics is the difference between layoffs and termination due to performance issues. Layoffs are never indicative of someone's personal performance or errors; they are consistently linked to broader business circumstances, like necessary downsizing. Essentially, layoffs are fundamentally about economic matters impacting the organization.
This is why mentioning individual qualities during the layoff process is irrelevant, as the termination is not the employee's fault.
I believe the correct answer is true.
After the dividend, the company's:
a. book value per share will become $6.31.
b. price-earnings ratio will adjust to 13.88.
c. shareholder value per share will amount to $18.60.
d. stock price will be $19.00.
e. earnings per share will equal $.94.
The result is: b
To determine the ex-dividend price per share on the day the dividend is distributed, we follow this method:
Ex-dividend Price = Share price before dividend - dividend amount per share
Ex-dividend price = $18.6 ($19 - $0.40)
Using this ex-dividend price, we can calculate the P/E ratio after the dividend.
P/E = $18.6/$1.34 = 13.88059
It indicates a financial advantage of $18,800 for accepting the offer. Kleffman Corporation currently produces part X31 with an annual output of 2,000 units. According to their accounting data, the production costs at this level are as follows: DM $6.90, DL $4.90, V MO $8.00, Supervisor $2.20, Depreciation $1.40, General $2.80, totaling $26.20 per unit. The unavoidable cost amounts to $2.80 x 2,000 units = $5,600. The depreciation is treated as a sunk cost, reflecting no cash flow impact on the business. Making the part internally results in a total expenditure of $52,400. The potential opportunity cost associated with generating an additional segment margin of $18,800 comes into play. The total cost aligns at $71,200 against the purchase cost of $23.40 x 2,000 = $46,800. The unavoidable cost remains at $5,600, resulting in a total of $52,400 when taken into account. Thus, the differential is computed as 71,200 - 52,400 = 18,800.
