answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Finger
10 days ago
12

An outside supplier has offered to produce and sell the part to the company for $23.40 each. If this offer is accepted, the supe

rvisor's salary and all of the variable costs, including direct labor, can be avoided. The special equipment used to make the part was purchased many years ago and has no salvage value or other use. The allocated general overhead represents fixed costs of the entire company, none of which would be avoided if the part were purchased instead of produced internally. In addition to the facts given above, assume that the space used to produce part U98 could be used to make more of one of the company's other products, generating an additional segment margin of $18,800 per year for that product. What would be the financial advantage (disadvantage) of buying part U98 from the outside supplier and using the freed space to make more of the other product?
Business
1 answer:
arsen [3.2K]10 days ago
5 0
It indicates a financial advantage of $18,800 for accepting the offer. Kleffman Corporation currently produces part X31 with an annual output of 2,000 units. According to their accounting data, the production costs at this level are as follows: DM $6.90, DL $4.90, V MO $8.00, Supervisor $2.20, Depreciation $1.40, General $2.80, totaling $26.20 per unit. The unavoidable cost amounts to $2.80 x 2,000 units = $5,600. The depreciation is treated as a sunk cost, reflecting no cash flow impact on the business. Making the part internally results in a total expenditure of $52,400. The potential opportunity cost associated with generating an additional segment margin of $18,800 comes into play. The total cost aligns at $71,200 against the purchase cost of $23.40 x 2,000 = $46,800. The unavoidable cost remains at $5,600, resulting in a total of $52,400 when taken into account. Thus, the differential is computed as 71,200 - 52,400 = 18,800.
You might be interested in
Price, Variable Cost per Unit, Contribution Margin, Contribution Margin Ratio, Fixed Expense For each of the following independe
Scilla [3549]

Answer and Explanation:

The calculation is detailed below:

1. Given that    

The break-even point is 115000 units  

Fixed cost = $349,600  

As we know that  

The Contribution Margin (CM) per unit is

=  Fixed cost  ÷  Break even units  

= $349,600  ÷ 115,000

= 3.04 per unit  

Next

Selling price = Variable cost  +CM per unit

= $4.56 + $3.04

= $7.60 per unit  

2. Given that

Net Income at 15600 units is $166,000  

Fixed cost = $458,000  

So,  

Contribution is

= $458,000 + $166,000

= $624,000  

Now

CM per unit is

= $624,000  ÷ 15,600

= 40 per unit  

The selling price per unit is: 120  

Thus,  

Variable cost per unit is

= $120 - 40

= 80 per unit  

And,

CM ratio is

= CM per unit ÷ Selling price per unit  

= $40 ÷ 120 × 100

= 33.33%  

3. Given that      

Net Operating income = $22,500    

CM ratio = 25%    

Actual revenue = $235,000  

Therefore,  

Contribution earned is

= $235,000 × 25%

= $58,750  

Now

Fixed cost = Contribution - Net income  

= $58,750 - $22,500

=$36,250  

4. Given that      

Variable cost ratio = 56%    

Fixed cost = $103,840    

Break even units= 23600 units

Thus,    

CM per unit is

= $103,840 ÷ 23,600

=$4.40  

CM ratio = 100 - 56% = 44%

And the selling price per unit is

=$4.40 ÷ 44%

=$10 per unit  

Now

Variable cost per unit is

=$10 × 56%

=$5.60 per unit  

And,

Contribution per unit is

= $10 × 44%

=$4.40 per unit

5 0
4 days ago
A ski company in Vail owns two ski shops, one on the west side and one on the east side of Vail. Ski hat sales data (in dollars)
Scilla [3549]

Response:

The null hypothesis is rejected if t(critical) falls outside the range of -1.86 to +1.86.

Explanation:

Our goal is to determine the sales discrepancy between the east and west sides.

The significance level for this analysis is set at 10 percent, or 0.1, which is indicated by "h".

The hypothesis outlined in the question is as follows;

Hj: μd = 0.

Hi: μd ≠ 0.

Or

Hj: μ(east) = μ(west).

Hi: μ(east) ≠ μ(west).

The t(critical) value is determined using the formula +/− t(c/2) {df = n1 + n2 - 2 }.

[ Note that c/2) is a subscript of t and c =.1].

The t(critical) value is +1.86 or -1.86

6 0
10 days ago
The initial price for a stadium is $800,000,000. There will be a 2% adjustment to the price, and $85,000,000 of revenue from the
soldi70 [3439]

Answer:

NPV = $246764705.88

Explanation:

The net present value of the stadium is calculated by subtracting the present value of cash outflow from the present value of cash inflow.

DATA

Initial cost = $800,000,000

Revenue from previous equipment sale = $85,000,000

Government funds designated for price reduction = $300,000,000

Discount factor for year 1 at 2% = 0.9804

Projected future cash inflow = $675,000,000

Resolution

NPV = Present value of cash inflows - Present value of cash outflows

NPV = $661,764,705.88 - $415,000,000

NPV = $246,764,706

Calculation Details

PV of Cash inflow = $675,000,000 x 0.9804

PV of cash inflow = $661,764,706

PV of Cash outflow = Initial cost - Revenue from equipment sale - Government funding

PV of cash outflow = $800,000,000 - $85,000,000 - $300,000,000

PV of cash outflow = $415,000,000

8 0
18 days ago
According to the BRANDZ model of brand strength, brand building involves people progressing through a sequential series of steps
Katen [3220]
A) Presence. A brand represents an identifiable symbol for a specific product made by a certain company. The BRANDZ MODEL, created by Millward Brown and WPP, examined how the process of brand development links to customer concerns. Knowing the duration of a product brand's existence prompts consumers to ask, "What do I know about it?"
4 0
21 hour ago
For the first time in two years, Big G (the cereal division of General Mills) raised cereal prices by 4 percent. If, as a result
Katen [3220]

Answer:

b. inelastic

c. Yes - it went down

Explanation:

The concept of demand elasticity assesses how much the quantity demanded shifts in response to price alterations.

Elasticity of demand = percentage change in quantity demanded/ percentage change in price

= -2/4 = -0.5

The absolute magnitude is 0.5

When the absolute value of the elasticity coefficient is lower than one, it indicates that demand is inelastic.

Demand is characterized as inelastic when price changes do not influence the quantity that consumers want.

The fall in quantity demanded is evidenced by the negative sign accompanying the change in quantity demanded percentage.

I hope my explanation is useful to you

7 0
1 month ago
Other questions:
  • Carla's business recently suffered an attack that shut down operations. What planning document describes how her business should
    7·1 answer
  • If the fictitious country of Islandia puts all of its production resources into fish, it can produce 60 units of fish. If it put
    8·1 answer
  • How can a firm increase the life of a product without involving product changes? a. reintroduction b. product extension c. new p
    10·1 answer
  • You work for a Defense contracting company. The company develops software applications which perform intensive calculations in t
    11·1 answer
  • Suppose you and a classmate are playing a game where your classmate proposes a division of​ $1.00. ​ Then, you either accept or
    13·1 answer
  • Location choice I has monthly fixed costs of $100,000 and per-unit variable costs of $10. Location choice J has monthly fixed co
    9·1 answer
  • A company has outstanding 20-year noncallable bonds with a face value of $1000, and 11% annual coupon, and a market price of $1,
    5·1 answer
  • On October 31, 2018, Damon Company’s general ledger shows a checking account balance of $8,397. The company’s cash receipts for
    11·1 answer
  • In a single year, Argentina can raise 100 tons of beef or produce 1,000 boxes of tulips. In the same growing season, Venezuela c
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements is FALSE? a. Cause-and-Effect forecasting assumes that one or more factors are related to dema
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!