While I haven't reviewed the text, if France had an ongoing rivalry with Germany, which is commonly viewed as a trigger for WWI, it stands to reason that France would certainly engage in conflict with Germany.
The correct option is B. This information discovered must be referenced to provide credit to the individual who originally stated it.
In my final year of secondary school, I was chosen as the top student and made the head boy. Being the head boy made me feel invincible in school; or so I believed, until this fateful day. The responsibilities of being head boy included leading various academic extracurricular activities such as debates and quiz competitions. Typically, this wouldn't have been an issue, except I was incredibly shy and timid. I constantly told myself that failure was not an option and generally managed well by passing debate responsibilities to lower-class students under the guise of 'training them.' When a significant debate was scheduled, it felt crucial for me to participate, and the entire school would gather for the event. I practiced for two days solidly in anticipation; memorizing my material extensively. Hours before the event, I secluded myself in a classroom for further practice. I was convinced I would excel. But I was mistaken. When the day finally arrived, my turn was saved for last, to be the highlight. I was already sweating profusely. There was no backing down now. I took a deep breath and steeled myself to step onto the stage, as silence enveloped the hall. Everyone’s eyes were on me, and I felt their stares pierce through me like lasers. As I started to speak, I stumbled through my greetings and realized I had forgotten the topic entirely. Glancing at the banner behind me for a clue, I turned back to be met by the principal's serious expression; her gaze made my heart sink. I had no idea she was seated in the front row all along. Taking a deep breath, I attempted to speak, but everything I had rehearsed slipped my mind. Suddenly, the room erupted in laughter. I was the punchline. I glanced at the principal, who was laughing the hardest. Trembling, I struggled to remain standing. The exit suddenly felt impossibly distant, and I couldn't endure it anymore, attempting to leave through the hall’s center while the laughter roared. Finally reaching the door, I realized I was pulling instead of pushing. After what felt like an eternity, I managed to push the door open and escaped outside. I could hear the principal trying to calm the laughter through the public address system while chuckling. I had never felt so embarrassed in my life.
The choice of using first, second, or third-person perspectives in any kind of literary writing, whether it be fiction or non-fiction, is dependent on the author's intent and the goals of the piece. There are distinctions between academic and non-academic writing that influence a writer's decision to use these perspectives for presenting viewpoints.
Firstly, employing the first-person perspective enables the author to share personal opinions with the audience, creating an intimate connection with them. The issue arises in academic contexts, where the first-person voice tends to be very subjective. Academic writing, particularly essays, must present ideas not as personal thoughts, but as broader viewpoints to be taken seriously.
Conversely, the third-person narrative promotes a sense of objectivity, as it presents information as factual and verifiable rather than grounded solely in the writer's thoughts. However, solely relying on this perspective can render the work too clinical, limiting the reader's connection to the author and the material.
This is why integrating both first and third-person voices enriches Cooper's essay; it allows readers to experience both closeness to the author's feelings and the assurance of factual accuracy. Cooper balances personal expression with verifiable evidence, presenting her arguments in a more relatable and accessible manner.
