The Iroquois hold courage in high regard.
Even though the other animals failed to reach the bottom of the ocean, the muskrat persevered in its attempt. It faced the unknown, nearly sacrificing its life in pursuit of its goal.
The question you posed is incomplete; here’s the full form: Is the following topic suitable for a research paper? Why or how not? how a cheetah eats its food A. No, it is too broad. B. No, it is too narrow. C. Yes, it is broad enough. D. Yes, it is narrow enough. The correct response is B. No, it is too narrow. In the context of a research paper, particularly one spanning four to six pages, multiple perspectives from various sources are required to discuss the primary subject. This means a topic is only suitable if it can be explored thoroughly over 4 to 6 pages necessitating numerous details. Writing about "how a cheetah eats its food" likely fails to meet this, as cheetahs probably have very few mechanisms for feeding, reducing the scope of detail needed. Thus, it's inappropriate because it lacks sufficient depth or variety, being overly narrow.
The narrator expresses sympathy towards Mrs. Cullinan due to her inability to bear children.
Answer:
I think Nelda considers Tracy a friend and values her.
Explanation:
In part b, the text states, “her hometown, this old river, and her loyal friends would always be here to come back to visit. She had a promise from her parents to return and visit Tracy and her family next summer.”
