Which function is the inverse of f Superscript negative 1 Baseline (x) = negative one-fifth x minus four-fifths? f Superscript n

Answer:

y=4x+7.75; continuous

Step-by-step explanation:

Let’s first establish the equation. Julie requires one segment of yarn measuring 7.75 inches: that's already known.

y = 7.75

Now, for the four pieces of yarn, each will be of equal length x. If she wants them to measure 1 inch, she'd need 4 inches of yarn. Therefore, the calculation would be:

y = 7.75 + 4x

Now, is this graph discrete or continuous? Continuous indicates there's a smooth line without gaps, while discrete has interruptions or spaces. In this scenario, x is continuous, as Julie can cut the yarn to any size for the four pieces. She is not limited to whole numbers; each piece could be, for instance, 2.5 inches or 3.1415 inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

The difference quotient represents the slope of the line connecting two points on a curve. To achieve the most accurate estimate, we need to use points that are nearest to x = 0. For this problem, the relevant points are (-0.001, 1.999) and (0.001, 2.001).

m = (2.001 − 1.999) / (0.001 − (-0.001))

m = 1

Avoid repeating the question as it can be perplexing.

Given 100 cookies and 20 brownies,
What is the highest number you can divide them equally by?

To find the greatest common factor,
Factor them:
100 = 2*2*5*5
20 = 2*2*5
Thus, the greatest common factor, which is shared between them, is 2*2*5 or 20.

Calculating further, 100/20=5
20/20=1

This means there are 20 groups, each containing 5 cookies and 1 brownie.


20 groups

In this problem the number we are working with is:

105,159

By definition we note:

thousand place: a five-digit quantity greater than zero.

Moreover, the rounding rule is:

if the digit being removed is 5 or more, increase the kept digit by one.

Therefore, rounding to the nearest ten thousand yields:

105,159 = 110,000

Answer:

105,159 rounded to the nearest ten thousand is:

105,159 = 110,000

Answer:

Robyn's model is logical, while Mark's is illogical.

Step-by-step explanation:

This question doesn't require calculations. What we need to do is analyze each model logically.

Mark's

Mark's representation indicates 20 instead of 2, which signifies that 200 is ten times greater than 20, making it nonsensical.

Robyn's

Robyn's representation displays 2, suggesting that 200 is 100 times greater than 2, which is not only accurate but also reasonable since 100 * 2 equals 200.