Answer:
A
Explanation:
The conflict centered around strong government versus weak government, with Federalists supporting a strong government and Anti-Federalists advocating for a weak government.
In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson enumerated a series of "facts intended for a discerning world" to illustrate that the British monarch sought to impose "an absolute Tyranny over these States" (the colonial states claiming their independence).
Included in Jefferson's list were assertions such as:
... The king refused to approve laws deemed essential and beneficial for public welfare.
... The king prohibited colonial governors from enacting or enforcing laws without his approval (which he was often reluctant to provide).
... People were forced to relinquish their rights to legislative assembly or were compelled to convene legislative bodies in inconvenient locations that created hardships.
... Legislative assemblies were dissolved by the king, who delayed new elections for extended periods.
... The king obstructed justice within the colonies and made judges reliant solely on his discretion for their salaries and job security.
... Standing armies were maintained in the colonies during peacetime without obtaining consent from the colonial legislatures.
Although this is not an exhaustive list, these points articulate Jefferson's grievances against the king's actions that hindered effective governance and lawmaking in the colonies.
I think it's the tenth amendment; that's the only one that seems logical.
