answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kow
1 month ago
14

A 55 year-old supervisor at a private company, who has always received good performance appraisals, is nevertheless fired. Two y

ounger supervisors (37 and 42 years old, respectively) from the same department and whose performance appraisals have been lower than the 55 year old’s were nonetheless retained by the company. The employer says that it had to save money and that older supervisor earned considerably more money than the younger supervisors, which he did. If the termination is legally challenged, a court would most likely decide:________.
a. For the employer because employee could not establish a prime facie case of age discrimination under the ADEA.
b. For the employer because one of the employers retained was also over 40 years of age.
c. For the employer because it had a lawful, non-discriminatory motive for the termination.
d. For the employer because the employer had engaged in disparate treatment based on age.
Business
1 answer:
harina [3.2K]1 month ago
4 0

Answer:

a. In favor of the employer since the employee failed to present a prime facie case of age discrimination under the ADEA.

Explanation:

This holds true, as if the employee had been able to establish a prime facie reason for his termination, it would significantly bolster his case in a court setting.

You might be interested in
Break-Even Sales Under Present and Proposed Conditions Portmann Company, operating at full capacity, sold 1,000,000 units at a p
Scilla [3267]

Answer:

1.                                            Variable           Fixed

Cost of goods sold          70,000,000     30,000,000

Selling Expenses             12,000,000        4,000,000

Administrative Exp.           6,000,000         6,000,000

Total                                  88,000,000     40,000,000

Note:

Cost of goods sold: 70% variable and 30% fixed on 10,000,000 respectively

Selling expenses: 75% variable and 25% fixed on $16,000,000 respectively

Administrative expenses: 50% variable and 50% fixed on $12,000,000 respectively

2. Unit Variable cost = Total variable cost / Units produced

Total Variable cost          88,000,000

Units produced                  1,000,000

Unit variable cost                  88      

Unit Contribution margin = Selling Price - Variable cost per unit

Selling Price                    $188

- Variable cost per unit       $88

Unit Contribution margin   $100

3. Break even Point (Units) = Fixed cost / Contribution margin per unit

Fixed cost                                    40,000,000

Contribution margin per Unit           100    

Break even Point (Units)               400,000

4. Break even point (units) = Fixed cost / Contribution margin per unit

Fixed cost                                           40,000,000

Increased Fixed cost                           5,000,000

Total New fixed cost                          45,000,000

Contribution margin per unit                   100      

Break even point (units)                      450,000

5. Determined sales units = (New fixed cost + Desired Income) / Contribution margin

New Fixed Cost                45,000,000

Desired Income                60,000,000

                                         105,000,000

Contribution margin                100        

per unit

Determined sales units      1,050,000

6. Maximum Income from operation = Total New sales - Total New variable cost - Total Fixed cost

Sales                               188,000,000

Increased sales               11,280,000

Total New sales              199,289,000

Variable cost                    88,000,000

New Variable cost     5,280,000

Total New Variable cost   93,280,000

Total New Fixed cost       45,000,000

Maximum Income from   61,000,000

operation

Number of units = Increase in sales / Price per unit

New variable cost = Number of units * Unit variable cost

Increased sales                    11,280,000

Price per unit                            188    

Number of units                      60,000

Unit variable cost x                  88.00

New Variable cost                 5,280,000

7. Net income = Sales - Variable cost - New fixed cost

Sales                           188,000,000

Less: Variable cost      88,000,000

Less: New fixed cost   45,000,000

Net Income                  55,000,000

8. Option b. Supporting the proposal due to its potential to boost operational income.

4 0
20 days ago
Why is using cash unhelpful when a person wants to apply for a loan in the near future?
stepan [3001]
Using cash is counterproductive and disadvantageous because relying solely on it leads to a lack of credit history, making it difficult for banks to assess your reliability for loan repayment.

7 0
1 month ago
A small construction firm specializes in building and selling single-family homes. The firm offers two basic types of houses, mo
harina [3228]

Answer:

The solution and relevant data for the exercise are contained within three images. The maximum profit amounts to 262.500.

Explanation

Please take into account the details provided in the exercise. Should you have any queries, feel free to reach out again. All the exercises are illustrated within three images.

8 0
29 days ago
Why is it important to recognize expansion opportunities?
Free_Kalibri [3164]

Answer:

Recognizing expansion opportunities is crucial as it allows for a wider array of products and services to be offered.  (this symbolizes growth in business development)

Explanation:

8 0
1 month ago
Smyth Industries operated as a monopolist for the past several years, earning annual profits amounting to $50 million, which it
Katen [2925]

Answer:

To begin with, we require a discount rate; in researching similar questions, I found that the discount rates ranged from 4% to 8%, so I opted for 6%.

The company has two options: continue operating in a competitive market or reduce its prices to eliminate competition.

Utilizing the perpetuity formula, the present value for the first option is calculated as follows: = $10,000,000 / 0.06 = $166,666,667

For the second option, the present value is:

PV of price reduction = $1,000,000,000 / 1.06 = $943,396,226 plus the present value of future net income

The present value of future net income = $50,000,000 / 0.06 = $833,333,333, but this figure must be discounted as the terminal value relates to the end of the current year, not now: $833,333,333 / 1.06 = $786,163,552

Consequently, the NPV associated with lowering prices is $786,163,552 - $943,396,226 = -$157,232,674, indicating this is certainly not a favorable plan.

3 0
21 day ago
Other questions:
  • The exchange rate for the yuan is quoted at 6.58 to the us$ if this changes to 6.25 yuan, what would be the change in price
    8·1 answer
  • What are other ethical concerns that Stilton may be facing?
    12·1 answer
  • Byron Books Inc. recently reported $13 million of net income. Its EBIT was $20.8 million, and its tax rate was 35%. What was its
    10·1 answer
  • Bickford Company plans to sell 135,000 units in November and 180,000 units in December. Bickford's policy is that 10% of the fol
    15·1 answer
  • In a state of market equilibrium, the intrinsic value of the stock will be the market price of the stock. An analyst with a lead
    15·1 answer
  • Burger King is a cash-basis taxpayer but maintains its financial accounting records using full
    14·2 answers
  • When talking about buyer-readiness stage in online lecture, we talked about an advertisement that encourages women to buy rings
    9·1 answer
  • Holly uses a perpetual inventory system. Holly sells $3,500 of blue jeans. The customer later brings $420 of blue jeans back to
    8·1 answer
  • Nasim was fired from his job after 3 years of good performance. His boss simply said that the organization was changing and did
    5·1 answer
  • Marcus is the owner of four Pizza Pizzazz restaurants in Santa Fe. Although the employee selection and training aspects of his b
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!