Erika is writing a coordinate proof to show that the diagonals of a rectangle are congruent. She begins by assigning coordinates

I genuinely believe that the answer is a

Answer:

Alright, we can express the baseball's motion with an equation like:

h(x) = a*x^2 + b*x + c

Here, x denotes time, while h(x) indicates height.

Let’s construct this:

The acceleration is:

a(t) = a

For velocity, integrating over time results in:

v(x) = a*x + v0

Where v0 signifies the initial vertical velocity.

Subsequently, we can determine position or height by integrating once more:

h(x) = a*x^2 + v0*x + h0

Here, h0 is the initial height.

<pthus our="" equation="" is:="">

h(x) = a*x^2 + v0*x + h0.

<pexamining the="" table:="">

When x = 0s, h(0s) = 6ft

<pthus:>

h(0s) = a*0s^2 + v0*0s + h0 = 6ft

            h0 = 6ft.

It’s also noted that:

h(2s) = h(4s)

<pthe symmetry="" of="" the="" quadratic="" function="" implies="" that="" axis="" lies="" between="" and="" located="" at="" x="3s.&lt;/p"><pin a="" standard="" quadratic="" function:="">

a*x^2 + b*x + c

The symmetry line is given by:

x = -b/2a

<pin this="" instance:="">

b = v0

a = a

<ptherefore we="" derive:="">

3s  = -v0/(2*a)

v0 = -3s*(2a)

<phaving gathered="" all="" necessary="" data="" for="" our="" equation="" we="" can="" express="" it="" as:="">

h(x) = a*x^2 - 6s*a*x + 6ft

<pnext focusing="" on="" just="" one="" variable="" we="" know="" that="" at="" x="2s," h=""><pso:>

h(2s) = 22ft = a*(2s)^2 - 6s*a*2s + 6ft

<pthus our="" resulting="" equation="" reads:="">

h(x) = (-2ft/s^2)*x^2 + (12ft/s)*x + 6ft

b) The height after 5 seconds is expressed as:

h(5s) =  (-2ft/s^2)*(5s)^2 + (12ft/s)*5s + 6ft = 16ft

</pthus></p></pso:></pnext></phaving></ptherefore></pin></pin></pthe></pthus:></pexamining></pthus>

The complete question reads:

Peter created two rays, AC and AP, sharing a common vertex at point A. Which of the following statements

might accurately describe Peter's drawing?

I. AC and AP are parallel.

II. PAC represents an angle.

III. AC and AP are at right angles.

A. I and II

B. II and III

C. I and III

D. I, II, and III

Answer:

Option B: II & III

Step-by-step explanation:

We know Peter has drawn rays AC and AP.

Since the point A is shared as the endpoint, it indicates an angular relationship at this common point.

This angle could potentially be 90°, suggesting that rays AC and AP may be perpendicular.

Thus, the valid statements that characterize his drawing are: II & III.

Answer:

B. y - 2 = 1/3(x - 3)