Answer:
The EPS will exceed $2.38
Explanation:
Earnings per share represent the funds available to shareholders after all expenses and taxes have been deducted. Restructuring costs are one-off expenses and are classified as other operating expenses in the Income Statement. Including these restructuring and similar charges in the Income Statement leads to reduced Earnings before Tax and eventually lower net profit. Exclusion of these costs will result in increased earnings, consequently raising the company's EPS.
Answer:
setup cost = $1.75
setup time = 2.625 min
Explanation:
given data
The firm operates for 250 days annually.
Annual demand is 22,000.
Daily demand is 88.
Daily production stands at 250.
Desired lot size is set at 63 (equivalent to 2 hours of output).
Holding costs are $40 per unit each year.
To determine
the setup cost and setup time
solution
The setup cost is calculated as
setup cost = 
......................1
Here, Q represents the desired lot size, H is the holding cost, d denotes daily demand, D is annual demand, and p is the daily output.
Plugging in the values,
setup cost = 
setup cost = 
setup cost = $1.75
Next,
the setup time is given by
setup time = 
....................2
setup time = 
setup time = 2.625 min
a. Determine the initial investment tied to replacing the current grinder with the new one.
Initial investment = cost of the new grinder + installation costs of the new grinder - after-tax revenue from selling the old grinder + increase in net working capital.
Cost of the new grinder = $105,000.
Cost to install the new grinder = $5,000.
After-tax revenue from the old grinder = $70,000 - ($70,000 - {$60,000 x (1 - 52%)] x 40%} = $70,000 - $16,480 = $53,520.
Increase in net working capital = $40,000 + $30,000 - $58,000 = $12,000.
Thus, initial investment = $105,000 + $5,000 - $53,520 + $12,000 = $68,480.
b. Assess the incremental operating cash inflows related to the new grinder installation. (Remember to factor in depreciation in year 6.)
New grinder cash flows:
Year 1 = [($43,000 - $22,000) x (1 - 40%)] + $22,000 = $34,600.
Year 2 = [($43,000 - $35,200) x (1 - 40%)] + $35,200 = $39,880.
Year 3 = [($43,000 - $21,120) x (1 - 40%)] + $21,120 = $34,248.
Year 4 = [($43,000 - $12,672) x (1 - 40%)] + $12,672 = $30,868.80.
Year 5 = [($43,000 - $12,672) x (1 - 40%)] + $12,672 + $18,000 (NWC) + $19,934.40 (after-tax salvage value) = $68,803.20.
Old grinder cash flows:
Year 1 = [($26,000 - $11,520) x (1 - 40%)] + $11,520 = $20,208.
Year 2 = [($24,000 - $6,912) x (1 - 40%)] + $6,912 = $15,964.80.
Year 3 = [($22,000 - $6,912) x (1 - 40%)] + $6,912 = $15,964.80.
Year 4 = [($20,000 - $3,456) x (1 - 40%)] + $3,456 = $13,382.40.
Year 5 = $18,000 x (1 - 40%) = $10,800.
Incremental cash flows:
Year 1 = $34,600 - $20,208 = $14,392.
Year 2 = $39,880 - $15,964.80 = $23,915.20.
Year 3 = $34,248 - $15,964.80 = $18,283.20.
Year 4 = $30,868.80 - $13,382.40 = $17,486.40.
Year 5 = $68,803.20 - $10,800 = $58,003.20.
c. Determine the expected terminal cash flow at the end of year 5 from the grinder replacement.
Terminal cash flow = regaining net working capital + after-tax salvage value = $18,000 + $19,934.40 = $37,934.40.
d. Show a timeline displaying the relevant cash flows for the proposed grinder replacement decision.
Year 0 = -$68,480.
Year 1 = $34,600.
Year 2 = $39,880.
Year 3 = $34,248.
Year 4 = $30,868.80.
Year 5 = $68,803.20.
Data regarding U.S. GDP
a) The nominal GDP growth rate from 1996 to 2016 was
131.72%, calculated using the following:[
= (2016 nominal GDP - 2009 nominal GDP) / 2009 nominal GDP x 100
= (18,707 - 8,073)/ 8,073 x 100
=
131.72%
b) The GDP deflator growth rate from 1996 to 2016 was 44.75%, derived as follows:
= (2016 GDP deflator - 1996 GDP deflator)/ 1996 GDP deflator x 100
= (105.93 - 73.18)/73.18 x 100
=44.75%
Clarification:
1. Data regarding U.S. GDP
Year Nominal GDP GDP Deflator (Billions of dollars) (Base year 2009)
2016 18,707 105.93
1996 8,073 73.18
2. As stated on wikipedia.com, "the GDP deflator (implicit price deflator) is a metric for the price level of all new, domestically produced, final goods and services within an economy for a given year."
3. Nominal GDP serves as a method of measuring a nation's economic productivity. It considers the current prices of goods and services, calculating the monetary value of products and services produced in an economy during a specific period.
4. The growth rate indicates the percentage change for a specific variable over a defined time frame. It is figured as the difference between the current year's variable and the base year’s variable, divided by the base year's variable, multiplied by 100.
