Complete Question:
James Stilton serves as the CEO of RightLiving, Inc., a corporation that purchases life insurance policies at a reduced price from terminally ill individuals and sells them to investors. RightLiving compensates terminally ill patients with a percentage of the future death benefits (typically 65%) and subsequently sells the policies to investors for 85% of the future benefit amount. The patients receive funds to assist with their medical and other expenses, while the investors are assured a positive return on their investments. The difference between the purchase and retail prices represents RightLiving's profit.
Stilton is aware that some sick patients might acquire insurance policies through deceit (by concealing their illness on the application). If an insurance company uncovers such fraud, it will annul the policy and withhold payment. While Stilton is confident that most of the policies he has acquired are legitimate, he recognizes that a few may not be.
Requirement:
What additional ethical dilemmas might Stilton encounter?
Answer with Explanation:
Stilton's ethical challenges include:
- Should he disclose potential fraud to investors prior to executing sales?
- What policies should be established to ensure that legitimate individuals can easily sell their policies, and how would lack of such policies be unfair for RightLiving, Inc.?
- Stilton also faces ethical issues because the business model benefits from the early deaths of clients, which raises moral questions.
Answer:
Faculty Advisor or Research Mentor
IRB Office
Explanation:
The Institutional Review Board (IRB) primarily ensures the protection of human subjects' rights and well-being in research conducted under its jurisdiction.
Obtaining IRB approval is mandatory before initiating any research.
Federal laws mandate that studies involving human participants must be reviewed by an IRB, which either approves or determines exemption of the project prior to beginning any research activities.
I believe it's likely true, although I apologize if I'm incorrect
Answer:
None of the distributions are optimal
Explanation:
None of the distributions are optimal
Justification: All three players have the same preference for the bedrooms: they rank the large room as most valuable, the medium room as moderate, and the small room as least desirable. Each player desires the large room to enhance their overall satisfaction and payoff. Distributing the large room to one player, the medium room to another, and the small room to the last player without additional compensation will likely result in feelings of jealousy among them.
