A baker has 5\dfrac145 ​4 ​ ​1 ​​ 5, start fraction, 1, divided by, 4, end fraction pies in her shop. She cut the pies in pieces

Answer:

a) Null hypothesis:

Alternative hypothesis:

b)

Given that the p-value is lower than the significance threshold in this situation, we have sufficient grounds to reject the null hypothesis.

c)

In this case, since the p-value exceeds the significance threshold, we have adequate evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.

d)

Here again, with the p-value being less than the significance level, we can reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

1) Provided data and references

represents the average of the samples

denotes the standard deviation of the samples

indicates the number of samples

is the value we are examining

defines the significance level for the test.

t represents the specific statistic of interest

indicates the p-value relevant to the test (the variable of concern)

Define the null and alternative hypotheses.

To assess if the true mean is at least 10 hours, we must set up a hypothesis:

Part a

Null hypothesis:

Alternative hypothesis:

If we consider the sample size being less than 30 and the population deviation unknown, it’s more appropriate to use a t-test to compare the actual mean with the reference value, calculated as:

(1)

Part b

In this scenario t=-2.3,

Initially, we need to calculate the degrees of freedom

Since this is a left-tailed test, the p-value is determined by:

In this instance, with the p-value being less than the significance level, we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Part c

For this situation t=-1.8,

We need to find the degrees of freedom

For the left-tailed test, the p-value is given by:

In this case, since the p-value is above the significance level, we have enough grounds to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis.

Part d

For this case t=-3.6,

Firstly, we find the degrees of freedom

Since we are conducting a left-tailed test, the p-value is calculated as:

Here, with the p-value being lower than the significance threshold, we can reject the null hypothesis.

Response:

The monthly income of Kim's business is $10,000.

Every month, Kim spends $3,000 on non-employee costs.

To achieve a monthly profit of $2,000, the highest possible expenditure for employees is calculated as follows:

10000 - 3000 - 2000 = 5000

With the cost of each employee being $1,000 a month, Kim can hire a maximum of 5000/1000 = 5 employees.

Hope this is useful

:)