Let p: x=4 let q:y=-2

Step-by-step answer:

The base of the exponential function is set at 1.29 for a period of 7 days, which is expressed as

f(x) = 86*(1.29)^x

To determine the daily rate, divide the variable x by 7 (keeping x as the number of weeks), resulting in

f(x) = 86*1.29^(x/7)

Applying the exponent rule, b^(x/a) = b^(x*(1/a)) = (b^(1/a))^x

we can simplify by setting b=1.29, a=7 to arrive at

f(x) = 86*(1.29^(1/7))^x

f(x) = 86*(1.037)^x since evaluating 1.29^(1/7) yields approximately 1.037

Rounding 1.037 to 1.04 gives a (VERY) rough estimate function

f(x) = 86 * (1.04^x)

1.04 is only an approximation because 1.04^7 is expected to return 1.29, it actually results in 1.316; meanwhile, 1.037^7 returns 1.2896, which is much closer to 1.29.

The test statistic (Z) is 2.5767, and the p-value of the test is 0.009975. The null hypothesis suggests that the smoking rate among students has not changed, while the alternative indicates otherwise. The z-statistic for the sampled proportion is computed, yielding z ≈ 2.5767. As we investigate whether the smoking percentage has shifted over the preceding five years, the two-tailed p-value is found to be 0.009975. This result is significant at a 99% confidence level, demonstrating substantial evidence that the percentage of smoking students has changed.

Detailed analysis:

The scenario mentions that a mouse covered a total of 3/24 miles over a span of 3 hours. The mouse traveled an identical distance during each hour. To find out how far the mouse went in one hour, we need to divide 3/24 miles by 3. Thus,

Matt's calculation indicates that the outcome is 3/8 hours. When he divides 3/24 by 3, he should take the reciprocal of 3, but he doesn't, resulting in 9 as the numerator and 24 as the denominator. The fraction 9/24 simplifies to 3/8. However, the accurate answer should have been 1/24 hours.

The correct choice is option D. The given equations are:...[1]...[2] Multiply equation [1] by 5 on both sides; we have...[3]. By using the elimination method, we can add equations [2] and [3] to eliminate y and determine x, resulting in... Dividing both sides by 13 yields x = 3. Substituting x back into equation [1] results in 2(3) - y = -4, which simplifies to 6 - y = -4. After subtracting 6 from both sides, we find -y = -10. Dividing through by -1 gives y = 10. Hence, the solution is (3, 10). Consequently, a valid equation that can replace 3x + 5y = 59 in the original set while still yielding the same result is 13x = 39.

2x + 4

To represent 2x + 4, the following is required:

2 positive x-tiles corresponding to 2x.

4 positive unit tiles for the value of 4.

3x + (-1)

To illustrate 3x + (-1), you will need:

3 positive x-tiles to depict 3x.

1 negative unit tile to signify (-1).